Hi,
Additional email, sorry for forgetting to paste wangqiwei email.
I am very pleased to see your contribution for RocketMQ community, especially
for this sustainable c++ sdk. Looking forward to hear from you. As there're
more and more dev. activities, you may have to request ICLA[1] for futu
Hi Wangqiwei,
Very pleased to see your contribution for RocketMQ community, especial for this
production sustainable c ++ sdk. Looking forward to your further feedback. With
more and more dev. activities, you may request ICLA[1] for more convenient
contribution. But now, Let’s move this project
Github user shroman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/141#discussion_r132088233
--- Diff:
logappender/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/logappender/common/ProducerInstance.java
---
@@ -70,24 +76,28 @@ public static MQProduce
Github user shroman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/140#discussion_r132087129
--- Diff:
common/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/common/protocol/body/RegisterBrokerBody.java
---
@@ -40,4 +57,114 @@ public void
setTopicCon
Github user shroman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/140#discussion_r132086276
--- Diff:
broker/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/broker/out/BrokerOuterAPI.java ---
@@ -148,12 +148,13 @@ private RegisterBrokerResult register
Github user qqeasonchen closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/139
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if th
Github user qqeasonchen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/139#discussion_r131905325
--- Diff:
client/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/client/impl/factory/MQClientInstance.java
---
@@ -255,19 +255,17 @@ public void start() t
Github user lyy4j commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/138
I agree with you that ConsistentHashRouter has a good enough
abstractionï¼ making the code more cleanner and extensible. But I think
SelectMessageQueueByConsistentHash will not increas
Github user Jaskey commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/138
@lyy4j
1. I will still suggest resuing ConsistentHashRouter since it has a good
enough abstraction which will make your selector much cleanner and easier as
well as extensible(s
Github user Jaskey commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/139#discussion_r131043380
--- Diff:
client/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/client/impl/factory/MQClientInstance.java
---
@@ -255,19 +255,17 @@ public void start() throws
10 matches
Mail list logo