Hi,
> As Apache Flink and Apache Storm use Apache License, I think it's OK to
> host these modules in rocketmq incubator repo.
Assuming I understand correctly in that you are writing new code to integrate
with Apache Flink and Apache Storm and place that code in the RocketMQ repo
that’s 100% O
This approach looks good to me. Roman Shtykh
On Monday, January 9, 2017 10:28 AM, Willem Jiang
wrote:
We have lots components[1] in Apache Camel which provide the integration of
the third party projects, all of them are Apache Licensed and we have no
trouble to host these components in
We have lots components[1] in Apache Camel which provide the integration of
the third party projects, all of them are Apache Licensed and we have no
trouble to host these components in Apache Camel repository.
But if the third party projects don't use the Apache License, we hosts
these components i
Honestly, I don't know how many Apache projects have evolved :) But I think you
are right. And this could also be just because they didn't think about
integrations at the beginning.
To my mind, it won't cause any problems to keep everything together if it is
gone through reviews, but it's up to
Good idea, roman :-)
AFAIK, at first, some other apache projects do not use these model. Util they
are enough mature, they began to consider to keep integration withe core code
base. Am i right ?
> 在 2017年1月4日，17:47，Roman Shtykh 写道：
>
> IMO, having extention/ or contrib/ directory (Storm app
IMO, having extention/ or contrib/ directory (Storm approach you mentioned) and
letting people create integration modules via PRs is good enough. As another
example, the same approach is also taken, for instance, by Apache Flink [1].
Also, keeping integration modules together with the core code b
I am not sure what kind of form if we move these RocketMQ community projects
into the Apache community, as the extension module or another way ?
Recently, apache Storm PMC member has contact me , hoping to move
rocketmq-storm integration Project move to its extension module.We also
received com
+1 for moving those project into Apache if there is no any legal issues.
Willem Jiang
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Roman Shtykh
wrote:
> Folks,
> I think an import
Folks,
I think an important part of RocketMQ project growth will be an integration
with other platforms.Currently, there are a couple of such integrations [1],
but they are a bit outdated and not all of them have Apache license.
Shall we make them Apache licensed? Shall we keep them in [1]?
I wou
