There are several projects that have separate git repos for various
adapters/integrations or protocol implementations as plugins. But it's
really up to the PPMC.
Bruce
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:32 AM, Von Gosling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Moving the sub projects off GitHub into Apache IMO shod be on that
I have updated the list of the three most important items for graduation to
add the movement of sub projects from Github to the ASF.
Bruce
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It a little odd to have 2 of the 3 steps marked as complete I think this
> needs to be update
Thanks, Justin, I was not aware of this.
Bruce
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Thank you for the feedback, this is why I post calls to contribute to the
> > reports to the dev@ list. Unfortunately, this report has already been
> > submitted.
>
> It can still be
The commit mode (RTC vs. CTR) is up to the PPMC. As Justin mentioned, RTC
can cause scalability issues. We should discuss it in the PPMC to come to a
decision as a community.
Bruce
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:48 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > we hope to one repository for all RocketMQ integr
Hi,
Sorry if I misunderstand anything her or something is getting lost in
translation.
> As we have control for these repos, we are able to control the quality of
> releases.
Who is we here? The we should be Apache RocketMQ project not an external
project on GitHub.
> So the current state is
tant.
Best Regards
dongeforever
-- Original --
From: "Justin Mclean";;
Date: Wed, Mar 8, 2017 05:48 PM
To: "dev";
Subject: Re: Podling Report Reminder - March 2017
Hi,
> we hope to one repository for all RocketMQ integration projects, is i
Hi,
> we hope to one repository for all RocketMQ integration projects, is it ok ? j
One or many repo are possible and ether are fine. It’s up to the PPMC.
> I’m also wondering how sustainable / scalable the "3 guys review mechanism”
> is going to be going forward. Anyone have any thoughts on th
Hi,
Moving the sub projects off GitHub into Apache IMO shod be on that list. What
is the progress with that?
we hope to one repository for all RocketMQ integration projects, is it ok ?
just as Bruce said, we must consider the release frequency in this mode. I have
not seen the one integration
Hi,
> Thank you for the feedback, this is why I post calls to contribute to the
> reports to the dev@ list. Unfortunately, this report has already been
> submitted.
It can still be edited here [1]. When that says final it can’t be.
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2017
Hi Justin,
Thank you for the feedback, this is why I post calls to contribute to the
reports to the dev@ list. Unfortunately, this report has already been
submitted. Do you know if this can be updated before it is submitted to the
board?
Bruce
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote
Hi,
It a little odd to have 2 of the 3 steps marked as complete I think this needs
to be updated and mention non complete things.
1. Confirm the IP review is complete. – COMPLETE
2. Make our first Apache release and vote in our first committer / PMC
members. – COMPLETE
3. Grow the commun
All,
Please don't forget to fill out this section (its new):
How would you assess the podling's maturity?
Please feel free to add your own commentary.
[ ] Initial setup - The initial setup went pretty well with assistance
from John Ament and his Incubator documentation improvement effort
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
prepare your quarterly board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 15 March 2017, 10:30 am PDT.
The report for your podling will form a
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
prepare your quarterly board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 15 March 2017, 10:30 am PDT.
The report for your podling will form a
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
prepare your quarterly board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 15 March 2017, 10:30 am PDT.
The report for your podling will form a
I have published the report for March:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROCKETMQ/Podling+Report+March+2017
If anyone has any additions or changes please let me know.
Bruce
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Von Gosling wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks Bruce and John :-)
>
> Looking forwar
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
prepare your quarterly board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 15 March 2017, 10:30 am PDT.
The report for your podling will form a
Hi All,
Thanks Bruce and John :-)
Looking forward to mentor review the report and sign off it.
> 在 2017年2月27日，02:44，Bruce Snyder 写道：
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have updated the report format and questions a bit in the wiki.
>
> MENTORS: Please take a look at the new questions requiring commentary and
Hi All,
I have updated the report format and questions a bit in the wiki.
MENTORS: Please take a look at the new questions requiring commentary and
sign-off.
Bruce
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Bruce Snyder
wrote:
> Thanks, John. I've added this format to the report.
>
> Bruce
>
> On Sat,
Thanks, John. I've added this format to the report.
Bruce
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 6:37 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> Hi,
> Just want to point out that the format for podling reports is changed for
> March. This was announced last month. This was based on board feedback.
>
> RocketMQ
>
> RocketMQ
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
prepare your quarterly board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 15 March 2017, 10:30 am PDT.
The report for your podling will form a
Hi,
Just want to point out that the format for podling reports is changed for
March. This was announced last month. This was based on board feedback.
RocketMQ
RocketMQ is a fast, low latency, reliable, scalable, distributed, easy to
use
message-oriented middleware, especially for processing lar
Hi All,
I have finished the report :-)
> 在 2017年2月24日，22:10，Von Gosling 写道：
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Thank your illustration.I will contribute it on tomorrow :-)
>
>> 在 2017年2月23日，22:47，Bruce Snyder 写道：
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> As you can see the message above from the Incubator PMC, it's time to
>>
Hi Bruce,
Thank your illustration.I will contribute it on tomorrow :-)
> 在 2017年2月23日，22:47，Bruce Snyder 写道：
>
> Hi All,
>
> As you can see the message above from the Incubator PMC, it's time to
> prepare another report for March.
>
> Please take a few moments to contribute to the report tha
Hi All,
As you can see the message above from the Incubator PMC, it's time to
prepare another report for March.
Please take a few moments to contribute to the report that I have started
on the following wiki page:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROCKETMQ/Podling+Report+March+2017
So
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
prepare your quarterly board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 15 March 2017, 10:30 am PDT.
The report for your podling will form a
26 matches
Mail list logo
