Hi,
> Those repos are the temporary repos for the second RocketMQ code marathon.
I get that it may be easier to use external repos, but that may possibly
indicate an issue of not voting in committers soon enough?
> the code on the review after the merge together to Apache external repo
How is
Hi, Justin
> On 2017年4月2日, at 07:19, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We’ve discussed this before [4] but I can see many links to new external
> GitHub repos on this page [1] on the Apache RocketMQ site. What are the
> reasons for the new external GitHub repos?
Those repos are the temporary re
Hi,
> Sorry to response for this problem, we replace this word with use :-)
It’s a minor issue but I think it’s important to make that distinction.
> As fo these problems, stevenschew will do this later~
Why is it Steven's job? We’re all volunteers here and I think all of the PMC
needs discuss
> I also not sure this page has been updated as requested. [5] These companies
> “use” Apache RocketMQ, companies are not “involved" in Apache projects
> individuals are.
>
Sorry to response for this problem, we replace this word with use :-)
> IMO the GitHub repo at [2] should be closed dow
