On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Glen Mazza wrote:
> I downloaded and tested the Tomcat version, it looks pretty good. I'm
> happy with ROL-1946, I've always wanted that feature. +1.
>
> The project blog does need to be updated though (the email I sent Dave
> earlier had suggestions). The Copy
I downloaded and tested the Tomcat version, it looks pretty good. I'm
happy with ROL-1946, I've always wanted that feature. +1.
The project blog does need to be updated though (the email I sent Dave
earlier had suggestions). The Copyright 2009 notice, the dead menu
links, etc., end up sendi
Actually, it uses a 2nd port to drive the whole process, defined in the
base pom.xml. But, as always, the build works fine from a command-line
window, and IIRC it works fine when building and debugging within
IntelliJ as well.
Glen
On 10/06/2013 09:36 AM, Dave wrote:
Based on the app/pom.xm
Based on the app/pom.xml (search for com.btmatthews.maven.plugins.inmemdb)
I believe the port is 3223.
- Dave
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Greg Huber wrote:
> Dave,
>
> I am using centos 6.4. Maybe its a port already in use, do we know what
> port its wanting? :
>
>
> > java.net.BindExcep
Dave,
I am using centos 6.4. Maybe its a port already in use, do we know what
port its wanting? :
> java.net.BindException: Cannot assign requested address
I can look more into this tomorrow..
Cheers Greg.
On 5 October 2013 14:17, Dave wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> I just updated to the latest tr
