snoopdave commented on pull request #112:
URL: https://github.com/apache/roller/pull/112#issuecomment-1001742386
Cool. I'm all for it if it makes things easier for folks using Netbeans.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
mbien commented on pull request #113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/roller/pull/113#issuecomment-1001671302
https://github.com/mikepenz/action-junit-report/issues/40
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
mbien commented on pull request #113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/roller/pull/113#issuecomment-1001670124
oh haha. It published it in he CodeQL action
https://github.com/apache/roller/actions/runs/1627718912
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
mbien commented on pull request #113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/roller/pull/113#issuecomment-1001666008
it builds and tests but it didn't upload the test report (it should appear
on the list on the left i think)
https://github.com/apache/roller/actions/runs/1627718913
Don't
mbien merged pull request #113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/roller/pull/113
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mbien commented on pull request #113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/roller/pull/113#issuecomment-1001661717
awesome. I merge it, lets see if everything builds.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
mbien commented on pull request #112:
URL: https://github.com/apache/roller/pull/112#issuecomment-1001653162
> Velocity changes LGTM. Do the Netbeans changes allow you to debug tests in
the IDE?
Its mostly for registering non-standard maven goals. like jetty:run, or the
selenium
I don't think that is the right behavior.
Dave
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 3:22 AM Michael Bien wrote:
> I noticed when upgrading from 6.1 to 6.1.1, Roller ran the upgrade
> scripts again, is that intended?
>
> Its probably fine to run them twice even though nothing db related
> changed in the
I noticed when upgrading from 6.1 to 6.1.1, Roller ran the upgrade
scripts again, is that intended?
Its probably fine to run them twice even though nothing db related
changed in the patch release - i was still wondering.
-michael
On 24.12.21 23:49, Dave wrote:
I put together a release
