I did several fresh pulls of the repos yesterday while testing as2wasm and
I can faithfully reproduce the issue(s). I can also reliably make it go
away if I do these things:
- comment out the ant task in the 'CoreTest' target in frameworks/build.xml
- remove the 'test' dependency from the 'main'
Carlos,
Here is my feedback about faq:
"Can I have write access to GIT?":
It is talking about providing patches by diff etc. I think we should talk
there about pull requesting to get used to people to such behavior.
"I've used Apache Flex before. How do I start using Apache Royale?"
It would
Thanks for the pointers Alex. Funnily I stopped getting it after playing around
with some scripts, cleaning my changes and checking out from git the unit tests
aren’t being run anymore and so I’m not getting it. I’ll come back to it when
it starts itching again, but for now I can work.
Carlos,
I'm seeing lot of attention this days for WebAssembly due to Safari and
> Edge supporting it.
> The expectations are high on that front and I'm reading that WASM could be
> almost ready for Spring in 2018.
> So I think this is a must for us in addition to HTML/JS/CSS effort. I'm
> trying
Hi,
As the subject suggests, I can't make up my mind about a working title for
the WebAssembly effort.
But there is also some good news: I have now assembled a usable toolchain
to create and publish 'as2wasm' projects. As with any proof of concept,
there are serious caveats with regard to
At some point, we could do things like create a pom.xml based on the
features they want. For example, the Spring Boot project has this page:
https://start.spring.io/
where you could go select the functionalities you want and download the
pom.xml. Then you simply run mvn install, and everything
Hi Carlos,
One question which come up to each of so far created website - Does they
need to be checked by someone who is native english speaker ?
Thanks, Piotr
2017-11-15 19:52 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira :
> Hi,
>
> I put on place a first draft of the FAQ page. You can
Hi,
I put on place a first draft of the FAQ page. You can review it here:
http://royale.codeoscopic.com/faq/
As always, please check it and read to discover :
* if the content is what you expect
* If sections are ok, and if you want to add more sections.
* for the content you consider right if
Hi Guys,
About one week ago I have discovered that Maven artifacts for Royale
framework are not available in the central Apache repository. Anyone who
tried build Hello World with cleaned ".m2" maven folder failed.
I just fixed that issue and you can now remove everything from .m2 and
build your
Hi Carlos,
IMO, it is a classic trade-off problem. It makes sense that many people
want to know exactly what libraries (and versions of those libraries) are
being used in the recipe for their app. And, similarly, some people want
to know exactly what code is being used in their app and will
Hi,
I must recognize that I'm not fully understand what's the problem.
If you use a Royale class to load data, you know it should link
Network.swc, To get html controls you use HTML.swc.
you want binding? so you refer to Binding.swc.
For me this is completely natural.
People working with an
My working copies are all torn up with the refactoring and I'd prefer not
to have to stop and build up another working copy to debug this, assuming
I can even reproduce it.
The factors are:
-The compiler Ant tasks use ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME to find the jsc.jar to run
-Looks like there are bugs in
Harbs,
While technically, it is true that for Royale, the pom.xml files need to
have the right SWCs specified, I think if we maintain the archetypes then
when you create a new Maven project for an app you will get every SWC
specified in your POM, and I don't think there is an issue for having
Hi,
I'm seeing lot of attention this days for WebAssembly due to Safari and
Edge supporting it.
The expectations are high on that front and I'm reading that WASM could be
almost ready for Spring in 2018.
So I think this is a must for us in addition to HTML/JS/CSS effort. I'm
trying to see the
I changed ROYALE_SWF_COMPILER_HOME and FLEXUNIT_HOME to match yours but the
result is the same.
FWIW this is ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME which appears to not resolve correctly:
C:\dev\flexjs\royale-asjs\frameworks\projects\Core\src\test\royale>echo
%ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME%
C:\dev\flexjs\royale-asjs/js
> why too error-prone?
Because it requires users to know which classes are in which swc. I don’t see a
reason for that. But, I’m not a Maven user, so take my thoughts with a grain of
salt.
Harbs
> On Nov 15, 2017, at 12:54 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote:
>
> Hi Harbs,
>
>
Hi Harbs,
why too error-prone? If you are developing a Royale app with Maven you
create a pom, and you add libraries on demand. So your build is totally
automated and you only need your project pom in the future and not manually
check if libraries are the required ones or not. I see just the
It works for me. It looks like your ROYALE_SWF_COMPILER_HOME is pointing to a
different location than mine.
Here’s the output I get:
CoreTest:
check-for-tests:
check-compiler-home:
check-transpiler-home:
check-compiler:
test:
[available] DEPRECATED - used to override an existing property.
In case of Maven artifacts the only needs of doing one build is for
convenient people who are using Maven build to develop SDK itself. If I'm a
user whom would like to use Royale and build my own application by Maven I
don't need download repository and build myself whole sources. I just need
to
I’m not sure which -config.xml is being used but the ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is
pointing to C:\dev\flexjs\royale-asjs/js
The tests are run as part of
C:\dev\flexjs\royale-asjs> ant clean all
When I try to run the test separately I get
Hi,
I prefer :
* only one vote thread
* compiler bundled (no release separately) - if people demand it, we always
can do that
about maven, I remember there's 3 separate builds due to how maven make
things, I'd like someone with maven skills could finaly join the three into
one, that was
Hi Piotr,
That's fine, we'll see what others think, but we are also discussing
whether the compiler is a separate release and vote thread or is bundled
with the framework.
-Alex
On 11/15/17, 12:03 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Yep we didn't decide it yet how
Hi,
Yep we didn't decide it yet how should be package release. In my opinion
this should look like that:
1) Package called royale-flexjs -0.9 Where it compiles to SWF and JS
2) Package called royale-0.9 where it compiles to JS only.
I like the idea of voting once where whole framework is in
23 matches
Mail list logo