Crud. I missed another one. Hopefully I got the last one now…
> On Dec 5, 2017, at 12:11 AM, Apache Jenkins Server
> wrote:
>
> The Apache Jenkins build system has built Royale-asjs (build #281)
>
> Status: Still Failing
>
> Check console output at
Hi Guys,
I have faced an issue where solution seems to be not so easy. I have MDL
Table (issue affects also List) with some rows.
If I simply assign to dataProvider = null it doesn't remove all content. It
is because in our DataItemRendererFactoryForArrayData and other type of
that class we have
There’s only 4 left on my list. I’ll probably get to them later. It would
probably be a good idea to put together an example project which uses as many
of the HTML elements as possible. I don’t know if I’m going to have the time to
do that.
> On Dec 4, 2017, at 9:19 PM, ha...@apache.org wrote:
Leave it in Basic. That should be a “true” Royale component. The HTML ones are
HTML element wrappers.
> On Dec 4, 2017, at 9:11 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote:
>
> Harbs,
>
> Isn't form is part of the Basic ? What are you going to do with that one ?
>
> Piotr
>
>
Harbs,
Isn't form is part of the Basic ? What are you going to do with that one ?
Piotr
2017-12-04 20:06 GMT+01:00 :
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> harbs pushed a commit to branch develop
> in repository
Thanks! I will wait for the next build. I'm not sure what do you mean by
regeneration of royale-config? - probably fix should be applied to that
template also.
Piotr
2017-12-04 19:54 GMT+01:00 Harbs :
> I already fixed royale-config-template. I searched asjs for every
I already fixed royale-config-template. I searched asjs for every instance of a
reference to the svg-manifest in HTML and changed that. I hope that does it.
Do we need to somehow force a regeneration of royale-config.xml?
> On Dec 4, 2017, at 8:45 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
Agree with that, but I don't see better resolution to that problem. Royale
will not be part of Apache Flex installer, so people probably face that
issue from time to time.
Thanks for the input!
Piotr
2017-12-04 18:37 GMT+01:00 RAT-Moonshine :
> Piotr Zarzycki wrote
> > If you
Piotr Zarzycki wrote
> If you go to the folder
> "*Downloads/apache-royale-jsonly-0.9.0-bin/js/bin/"*
> and give in the terminal access to the file mxmlc by command "*sudo chmod
> 755 mxmlc*" - You will be able to build Royale examples. - I will probably
> add this one to the instruction.
Interesting.
What is the generated data structure for that property? How does the
generated data structure differ if the property is getter/setter?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 12/4/17, 3:30 AM, "Yishay Weiss" wrote:
>We ran into an interesting problem with minification. If you
I missed one of the examples. Hopefully the latest commit does it…
> On Dec 4, 2017, at 3:18 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
> wrote:
>
> The Apache Jenkins build system has built Royale-asjs (build #277)
>
> Status: Still Failing
>
> Check console output at
Dany,
As for your problem. If you are on Mac you have in Moonshine helper called
"Access Manager" - It allow omit some restrictions. Once you open some
project you can go to menu File -> Access Manager - and point there all
paths. For example path to folder with downloaded SDK.
Thanks, Piotr
Dany,
I see on your screenshot that you are trying to use sources instead of
binary distribution of Royale SDK. Can you download this one [1]. Once
again go through the instruction for Moonshine and use examples from that
package.
[1]
We ran into an interesting problem with minification. If you have a component
with an attribute that’s initialized like this:
public var myProp:Boolean = false;
and you try to initialize it from mxml () the result will
be myComp == true in debug and myComp == false in release.
We found 2 ways
Hi Piotr,
I did what you said.
SDK folder and project folder are in my downloads folder.
When I try to compile I get this permission denied error [1]
When creating the project itself I got this console output [2]
thx, Dany
[1] http://www.archemedia.eu/royale/img2.png
[2]
That's cool! :)
If you need some help from me in order to integrate with current website
let me know. You already have credentials in the webstite, but maybe for me
could be more easy as I know the tips and tricks to integrate in the
current website.
Thanks!
Carlos
2017-12-04 9:51 GMT+01:00
Yup. I missed some references in Text. The next build should work.
> On Dec 4, 2017, at 12:29 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote:
>
> I think we should wait for the next build :) [1]
>
> [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/Royale-asjs/277/
>
> 2017-12-04 11:25 GMT+01:00 Apache
I think we should wait for the next build :) [1]
[1] https://builds.apache.org/job/Royale-asjs/277/
2017-12-04 11:25 GMT+01:00 Apache Jenkins Server
:
> The Apache Jenkins build system has built Royale-asjs (build #276)
>
> Status: Failure
>
> Check console output at
Hi Dany,
It should be recognized. Try to reset settings for Moonshine - Go to
General -> Reset to Default. Moonshine should work with current version of
Royale SDK. - Let me know whether reset helped.
In case of opening examples: You need to locate "Main source folder" [1] -
This is the folder
The file in question was created by me on a Mac. An additional file which
caused a problem on Yishay’s machine was StringTextLineFactory from TLF Lines
443, 445 and 446 (in the comment) were output as garbage characters by the
Royale compiler without explicitly setting the encoding to UTF-8.
Java seems [1] to take the system encoding which can vary between windows and
other machines.
My main editors are Eclipse (FB) and vim, Eclipse is set to use UTF-8 while vim
is using latin1 by default. But in any case, these are easily configurable so I
don’t see the harm in requiring users
I disagree. The wording is misleading and wrong and I don’t think anything
needs to be propagated in this case.
I did not close the PR because I wanted to leave it up to other PMC members to
decide if I’m right or wrong. I’ll leave it other folks to decide if this is an
issue.
Harbs
> On Dec
Sorry about that. I shouldn’t make assumptions.
Harbs
> On Dec 4, 2017, at 11:03 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
>> I assume Justin asked you to write this email.
>
> No I didn’t,
23 matches
Mail list logo