Jenkins build is back to normal : royale-asjs #1440

See

Re: Migrating Enterprise Flex Application

I am trying the package paths for swc for the first time. I use it quite a lot in the Flex world. A bit confused about the -js-source-path option. I don't see that option in mxmlc. Am I missing something? -- Sent from: http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/

Re: Migrating Enterprise Flex Application

I am using the package paths for the first time. I use it quite a lot in the Flex world. Bit confused about your -js-source-path. I don't see this option in the mxmlc compiler. Am I missing something? -- Sent from: http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/

Jenkins build is back to normal : royale-asjs_jsonly #1691

See

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-typedefs #771

See -- Started by timer Building on master in workspace > git.exe rev-parse

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #1690

See -- [...truncated 97.68 KB...] create-config: [copy] Copying 1 file to

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #1689

See Changes: [aharui] comment out resource bundles for now [aharui] fix override for SWF [aharui] try to use variables so repos don't have to be siblings

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #1688

See -- [...truncated 71.21 KB...] clean-tests: clean: check-for-tests: clean-tests: clean: check-for-tests: clean-tests: clean: clean: [delete]

Apache Royale Jenkins CI (was Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3)

Hi, It turns out that the checkintest do not actually run on master. They must run on the agent. We've not been actually testing our code. The player does not launch and then the flashlog from the last test to run on the agent is reported on. I am in the process of moving the builds that

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #1439

See -- [...truncated 2.40 MB...] [mxmlc] org.apache.royale.states.AddItems depends on org.apache.royale.core.IDocument [mxmlc] Dependencies calculated

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #1438

See -- [...truncated 2.40 MB...] [mxmlc]

Re: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: clean compile of 'full' Flex mx:RemoteObject

It does not work yet. That's what I'm working on now. Most of the simpler, fundamental UI widgets have lots of flash dependencies so it was better to produce a new platform-independent implementation in Basic and re-use those beads in the migration set. As we find out what APIs folks need

Re: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: clean compile of 'full' Flex mx:RemoteObject

Hi Alex, full compile of this classes means as well that works? This kind of code since is about 80% not flash dependent, could be working? Just curious thanks Carlos El jue., 4 oct. 2018 a las 20:51, escribió: > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > >

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #1437

See Changes: [aharui] clean compile of 'full' Flex mx:RemoteObject [aharui] try to cut down on failures on CI server -- [...truncated 2.40 MB...]

Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

Hi Om, If make_branches succeeds, then you shouldn't need to go back and delete branches and tags and run make_branches again if the "maven" step fails. You might need to revert any changes to the release branch that the "maven" step did, but then you should be able to delete the local copy of

Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 1:48 AM Alex Harui wrote: > Om, it looks like you are still deleting and recreating the branches. > Does this mean you have never completed the make_branches step? Yes, I delete the tags, branches (remote) each time something fails. Then I do a global search for 0.9.5

Re: Migrating Enterprise Flex Application

AdvancedTableDataGrid is normally in a SWC? I wonder if the Royale compiler supports package paths instead of URIs for SWCs. Are package paths for SWC components working elsewhere?You might need to use the -js-source-path+=com/infogix/iitap/component/flexuiplatform/controls/datagrid

Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 9:33 AM Alex Harui wrote: > Om, > > What version of Java are you using? Maven uses Java and maybe there is an > incompatibility in the server communication layer of Java. > OmPrakashs-MacBook-Pro:release om$ java -version java version "1.8.0_181" Java(TM) SE Runtime

Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

It seems that releases are overly automated. Seems like once everything is built and tests are passed a set of scripts in a runbook can be manually run by the RM. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 4, 2018, at 9:23 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > I don't know for sure, but I believe much

Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

Om, What version of Java are you using? Maven uses Java and maybe there is an incompatibility in the server communication layer of Java. -Alex On 10/4/18, 1:14 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: DSL via AT :-) Although this morning was a different connection (at work)

Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

I don't know for sure, but I believe much of it is part of Maven's default release process. We "must" prove that the example sources pass all standard release requirements (pass the RAT check and compiles without error). I think by default after those tests, Maven packages up the sources for

Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

I am curious about why we are uploading example swcs to maven central. What is the usecase? Thanks, Om On Thu, Oct 4, 2018, 2:26 AM Alex Harui wrote: > We are using both Maven and Ant to create releases. Some of our users > prefer Maven others prefer Ant. Best way to make sure both work is

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #1436

See -- [...truncated 2.33 MB...] [mxmlc] org.apache.royale.states.AddItems depends on org.apache.royale.core.IDocument [mxmlc] Dependencies calculated

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #1435

See -- [...truncated 2.33 MB...] [mxmlc] org.apache.royale.states.AddItems depends on org.apache.royale.core.IDocument [mxmlc] Dependencies calculated

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #1434

See Changes: [noreply] Update Container.as -- [...truncated 2.33 MB...] [mxmlc] org.apache.royale.states.AddItems depends on

Re: Migrating Enterprise Flex Application

Here is another js compiler error that I am trying to resolve. My mxml contains the following fragment. http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009; xmlns:mx="library://ns.apache.org/royale/mx" xmlns:js="library://ns.apache.org/royale/basic"

Re: Migrating Enterprise Flex Application

Thank you. I will give it a try commenting out resource bundle usage. -- Sent from: http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #1433

See Changes: [noreply] Update Container.as getChildren() Added [om] Revert to 0.9.4 [noreply] Update ListBase.as [noreply] Update UIComponent.as

Re: [royale-asjs] annotated tag org.apache.royale.framework-0.9.4-rc1 updated (29713a0 -> 25c496e)

Just created this ticket: SRCTREE-6128 Let's see how it evolves Carlos El mié., 3 oct. 2018 a las 19:33, Carlos Rovira (< carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com>) escribió: > I'll do it's clear source tree is doing something under the hood and it's >

Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

We are using both Maven and Ant to create releases. Some of our users prefer Maven others prefer Ant. Best way to make sure both work is to use Maven for Maven and Ant for Ant. I don't know if is really Maven that is failing or just something wrong with Om's internet connection. -Alex On

Re: NextGenAS tutorials on Royale website

Hi Harbs, El mié., 3 oct. 2018 a las 11:54, Harbs () escribió: > I agree that it would be great to make it easier to use Node. There are > some sticking points currently. To answer your points: > > 1. Yes. It’s kind of similar in that it declares dependencies and > optionally build tasks.

Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

Hi Harbs, for me Maven is not easier, seems as difficult as ANT. For me the points for maven is the reliability and robustness of the build process and the management of dependencies. ANT was the first step for me, and I always liked, but the problems was that it was more a way to script than

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #1431

See -- [...truncated 2.33 MB...] [mxmlc] org.apache.royale.states.AddItems depends on org.apache.royale.core.IDocument [mxmlc] Dependencies calculated

Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

Om, it looks like you are still deleting and recreating the branches. Does this mean you have never completed the make_branches step? Is make_branches failing trying to run a build in the develop branch and uploading 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT artifacts? I supposed we could try to find a way to skip

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #1432

See Changes: [noreply] Update RadioButtonGroup [noreply] Update BarSeries.as [noreply] Update ColumnSeries.as [om] Revert to 0.9.4 [om] [maven-release-plugin] prepare branch

Re: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: Update CategoryAxis.as

I don't think CategoryAxis should be a UIComponent. It doesn't look like it was in Flex. Check the Flex class inheritance when choosing a base class. You don't always have to use the same base class, but it should help you decide whether it should be a UIComponent or not. Thanks, -Alex On

Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

DSL via AT :-) Although this morning was a different connection (at work) On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 1:09 AM Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > Neverending story ;) What's your internet connection actually? > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018, 10:04 AM OmPrakash Muppirala > wrote: > > > Hmm, failed again at a different

Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

Neverending story ;) What's your internet connection actually? On Thu, Oct 4, 2018, 10:04 AM OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > Hmm, failed again at a different spot: > > [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Apache Royale: Framework: Themes: > Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Sunflower-Theme SUCCESS [ 22.251 s] > >

Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

Hmm, failed again at a different spot: [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Apache Royale: Framework: Themes: Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Sunflower-Theme SUCCESS [ 22.251 s] [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Apache Royale: Framework: Themes: Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Topaz-Theme SUCCESS [ 18.741 s]

RE: Getting An Emulation Component To Run

Thanks. -Alina -Original Message- From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2018 12:43 PM To: us...@royale.apache.org; dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run The first thing to do is run the app in a debugger to see

Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run

The first thing to do is run the app in a debugger to see if you get exception indicating a point of failure. A fair number of components are working well enough for TourDeFlex to work. Many times it will be a simple fix to one of the components that already runs in TourDeFlex. If it is

Re: Work on Emulation

Hi Pashmina, I searched through the code for verticalAxis. I saw one one UIComponent. It should probably not be there. Where is the one you are using? Sounds like its type-annotation is not correct. Regarding IVisualElement, try having IVisualElement extend IChild. HTH, -Alex From:

Getting An Emulation Component To Run

Hi, 90% files of our Apache Royale Application is compiled successfully. But it shows nothing in output. Should we follow https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/wiki/Emulation-Components#getting-an-e mulation-component-to-run for our every emulated mx & spark Component? It will be enough to

RE: Work on Emulation

Hi, I am using CategoryAxis Error occurred: D:\apache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js-swf\royale-asjs\frameworks\projects\SparkRoyale\src\main\royale\com\shm\reports\view\Common\shmChartComponent.mxml(305): col: 5 Error: In initializer for 'mx:verticalAxis', type