Re: [Royale - ASJS] PAYG list beads

2017-12-03 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
cember 1, 2017 6:23:41 PM > To: dev@royale.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Royale - ASJS] PAYG list beads > > Update (aka, Thinking Out Loud): > > I think the way to go here is to have new beads like ItemsAdded, > ItemsRemoved, ItemsChanged, added to DataItemRendererFactoryForArrayList

RE: [Royale - ASJS] PAYG list beads

2017-12-02 Thread Yishay Weiss
. From: Peter Ent <p...@adobe.com.INVALID> Sent: Friday, December 1, 2017 6:23:41 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: [Royale - ASJS] PAYG list beads Update (aka, Thinking Out Loud): I think the way to go here is to have new beads like ItemsAdded, ItemsRemoved, ItemsChanged,

Re: [Royale - ASJS] PAYG list beads

2017-12-01 Thread Peter Ent
Update (aka, Thinking Out Loud): I think the way to go here is to have new beads like ItemsAdded, ItemsRemoved, ItemsChanged, added to DataItemRendererFactoryForArrayList and that bead can delegate the updating of the DataGroup to those beads, if present. The default can be a bead that listens

Re: [Royale - ASJS] PAYG list beads

2017-12-01 Thread Peter Ent
Thanks for the reminder, Justin. I had thought about the Decorator pattern; after all, beads really should be thought of as Decorators. When we add a password protection bead to the TextInput component, it does not change what the TextInput component is, it merely enhances it. The problem is

Re: [Royale - ASJS] PAYG list beads

2017-11-30 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > thinking that when you add DataProviderItemsChangeNotifier to a List strand, > you could also replace the itemRenderer factory that is more "capable": > > DataItemRendererFactoryForArrayListSupportsItemsAdded > DataItemRendererFactoryForArrayListSupportsItemsRemoved >