Hi Harbs,
I'm investigating some issue in Moonshine with Royale and I have noticed
that after your changes in HTML module component TextNode and InnerHTML is
in "html-manifest.xml" and in "basic-manifest.xml" of that module.
Is it for purpose or simply mistake ?
Thanks,
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patr
It was on purpose. That lets you use TextNode and InnerHTML using both the
basic and the html namespaces. Those are likely to be used with Basic
components in addition to HTML ones.
> On Dec 16, 2017, at 6:58 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote:
>
> Hi Harbs,
>
> I'm investigating some issue in Moonshin
Ok Thanks.
Another question - Do you see in VSCode duplicate definition in code
completion for example Accordion ?
Thanks, Piotr
2017-12-16 18:26 GMT+01:00 Harbs :
> It was on purpose. That lets you use TextNode and InnerHTML using both the
> basic and the html namespaces. Those are likely to
Yes. I see duplication. In some places many times. For example, ContainerBase
shows up 9 times.
> On Dec 16, 2017, at 7:37 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote:
>
> Ok Thanks.
>
> Another question - Do you see in VSCode duplicate definition in code
> completion for example Accordion ?
>
> Thanks, Piotr
>
I see the same in Moonshine. Do you think that is problem in extension or
somewhere in our code ? I was digging into the modules but didn't found
anything. I have checked also for Jsonly package what actually is in swcs,
but also no clue what is happen.
Piotr
2017-12-16 18:42 GMT+01:00 Harbs :
No idea. I was planning on asking Josh at some point.
> On Dec 16, 2017, at 7:47 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote:
>
> I see the same in Moonshine. Do you think that is problem in extension or
> somewhere in our code ? I was digging into the modules but didn't found
> anything. I have checked also for J
Anyone who use Flash Builder seeing also duplication ?
Thanks, Piotr
2017-12-16 18:47 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
> I see the same in Moonshine. Do you think that is problem in extension or
> somewhere in our code ? I was digging into the modules but didn't found
> anything. I have checked also f
In FB, ContainerBase only shows up once in AS code completion and not in
MXML (since it isn't in a manifest).
HTH,
-Alex
On 12/16/17, 9:56 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote:
>Anyone who use Flash Builder seeing also duplication ?
>
>Thanks, Piotr
>
>2017-12-16 18:47 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
>
>> I s
Hi Alex,
Thanks for the information. I'm still not sure where the bug is. It is for
sure not in the Moonshine code - I have checked it and Harbs confirmed that
he is seeing the same in VSCode. I don't have such problems with Flex SDK.
Thanks, Piotr
2017-12-18 6:39 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
> In
Hi Guys,
It look like those duplication that is something on the Royale. Josh took
a look into the problem [1]. Should we change compile-js-config.xml or it
is something which we need to look deeper somewhere ?
[1]
https://github.com/prominic/Moonshine-IDE/issues/87#issuecomment-352525906
Thank
I think the problem is a bit deeper.
Using external-library-path is not going to work for js compiles because it
needs to link the includes when compiling to JS.
catalog.xml needs to be generates sans the dependency classes though (I think).
I’m not sure the right way to go about that. For most
I think Josh correctly analyzed that the JS SWCs have duplicate entries.
As Harbs says, the compiler doesn't have an easy way to distinguish
between external definitions that don't need goog.require and ones that
do, so we currently have duplicate entries by putting upstream SWCs on the
library-pa
Alex,
Flash Builder has such tolerance ? Do you have any knowledge how that IDE
handles such thing ? I will spend some time to setup Intellij and see how
am I seeing this thing there.
I completely agree with you that we have big fish to fry - This is exactly
one of them. It affects two IDEs which
Flash Builder does not seem to be showing duplicates.
At minimum, it can just sort all of the classes it finds and toss out
duplicates.
The way the compiler deals with duplicates is by using the compile time
stamp in the catalog.xml and always let source-path entries win over
library-path entries
14 matches
Mail list logo
