Re: FALCON_HOME and FALCONJX_HOME

2017-09-29 Thread Erik de Bruin
I'm talking about getting the source on my system such that it will build and I can work on it. I am starting a separate thread on the issues I'm finding. Thanks, EdB On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > Hi Erik, > > Not sure what you mean by

Re: FALCON_HOME and FALCONJX_HOME

2017-09-29 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Erik, Not sure what you mean by "install". I was only focused on getting the repos set up on someone's computer to make changes and push them. I haven't put in much documentation of the IDE-friendly packaging which I think we should use that doesn't use the Apache Flex SDK Installer. Instead

Re: FALCON_HOME and FALCONJX_HOME

2017-09-28 Thread Erik de Bruin
"packaging branch"? I do think some coordination (wiki?) is in order, because apparently we both spend a good deal of time on the same thing... EdB On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > In the build.xml files, both are used. It is a separate work

RE: FALCON_HOME and FALCONJX_HOME

2017-09-28 Thread Yishay Weiss
My guess is that neither is obsolete as both of them reside in royale-compiler. Maybe we just need to rename them to COMPILER_SWF_HOME and COMPILER_JS_HOME. But my compiler knowledge isn’t great so I’d wait for more educated answers. From: Erik de Bruin Sent:

Re: FALCON_HOME and FALCONJX_HOME

2017-09-28 Thread Carlos Rovira
To be coherent with what we are doing in always thinking in new users I will talk about "ROYALE_HOME" Moreover taking into account that we killed falcon codename (the repo is now "royale-compiler") 2017-09-28 15:45 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki : > Hi Erik, > > Actually I'm