joys a consensus? If not, there should
> probably
> > be a vote. I don’t want to encourage a dynamic where debates are won by
> > unilateral action.
> >
> > If everyone feels comfortable with Carlos releasing with mvn, then I
> > won’t object. If there are res
ill like to give it
> another week, and see if an RM newbie like me can apply the process
> suggested by Alex.
>
> Thanks.
>
> From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>
> Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2020 7:34 PM
> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:
Thanks.
>
> From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>
> Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2020 7:34 PM
> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Releasing: Finally giving up
>
> Hi Yishay,
>
> I think we were all in ag
ira<mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2020 7:34 PM
To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Releasing: Finally giving up
Hi Yishay,
I think we were all in agreement so I'll make the release. Right now we're
<mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2020 7:34 PM
To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Releasing: Finally giving up
Hi Yishay,
I think we were all in agreement so I'll make the release. Right now we're
voting the compiler-bui
do I start?
>
> From: Alex Harui<mailto:aha...@adobe.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2020 8:50 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>; Yishay
> Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Releasing: Finally giving up
>
>
<mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2020 1:27 PM
To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Releasing: Finally giving up
Hi All,
I'm member of Apache Foundation for quite some time now. I think I have
ok Yishay, thanks!
El vie., 27 mar. 2020 a las 9:57, Yishay Weiss ()
escribió:
> No objections from me.
>
>
> From: Carlos Rovira
> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 11:47:24 AM
> To: Apache Royale Development
> Subject: Re: Releasing: Finally
No objections from me.
From: Carlos Rovira
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 11:47:24 AM
To: Apache Royale Development
Subject: Re: Releasing: Finally giving up
Hi Alex
thanks. I want to ask first Yishay since he took over. If he doesn't object
anything we c
k...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2020 1:27 PM
> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Releasing: Finally giving up
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm member of Apache Foundation for quite some time now. I think I
&
mail.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2020 1:27 PM
To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Releasing: Finally giving up
Hi All,
I'm member of Apache Foundation for quite some time now. I think I have
wrote maybe 2-3 emails dur
Chris and Carlos, please actually produce a wiki page with the list of Maven
commands. I'm sorry, but don't think it will be as amazingly simple as you
stated. So do it! Maybe Chris first to document the steps in a wiki page,
then Carlos next to prove that Chris didn't miss anything in the do
> generally the build is currently already in a state we should be
> > able to
> > > release Royale with Maven.
> > > I intentionally put all the bells and whistles in a profile that
> you
> > need
> > > to activate “royale-release”.
> > > If you
n release.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > Von: Piotr Zarzycki
> > Antworten an: "dev@royale.apache.org"
> > Datum: Donnerstag, 26. März 2020 um 12:27
> > An: Apache Royale Development
> > Betreff: Re: Releasing: Final
ycki
> Antworten an: "dev@royale.apache.org"
> Datum: Donnerstag, 26. März 2020 um 12:27
> An: Apache Royale Development
> Betreff: Re: Releasing: Finally giving up
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm member of Apache Foundation for quite
hat, it should be a normal Maven release.
>
> Chris
>
> Von: Piotr Zarzycki
> Antworten an: "dev@royale.apache.org"
> Datum: Donnerstag, 26. März 2020 um 12:27
> An: Apache Royale Development
> Betreff: Re: Releasing: Finally giving up
>
> Hi All,
>
>
Zarzycki
Antworten an: "dev@royale.apache.org"
Datum: Donnerstag, 26. März 2020 um 12:27
An: Apache Royale Development
Betreff: Re: Releasing: Finally giving up
Hi All,
I'm member of Apache Foundation for quite some time now. I think I have wrote
maybe 2-3 emails during that
rzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2020 1:27 PM
> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Releasing: Finally giving up
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm member of Apache Foundation for quite some time now. I think I have
&g
From: Piotr Zarzycki<mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2020 1:27 PM
To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Releasing: Finally giving up
Hi All,
I'm member of Apache Foundation for quite some time now. I think I have wrote
Hi All,
I'm member of Apache Foundation for quite some time now. I think I have
wrote maybe 2-3 emails during that time on members mailing list. - Why? -
well I'm a person which doesn't like never ending stories, stories which
are not end up with consensus nor action and I'm sorry but this is how
Hi Guys,
I'm a lover of Flex dev guy since more than 10 years, been members of
Flex group on Montpellier (France) at golden age of Flex and go at all
conferences when Michaël Chaize came to Montpellier (and using Flex
every day).
First of all I want to thank every one of you for your hard work,
Hi,
that's amazingly simple, so I think we should go that way without doubt. I
think reached this point there's a clear sense of that we need to go that
route.
We tried our best to stick with the previous process and we're all
loosing lots of time. Then currently seems no more people in the commu
Ok,
I'll write this a last time as I do feel like we're going in circles and will
from now on not participate in any discussion involving releasing on a CI
server.
A correct Maven release would use (There will be some additional profiles to
activate to include all modules)
1) the "mvn releas
uld cover.
> > >
> > > Focus on what you want to be provided or ensured by any
> process, no
> > matter
> > > which tool it is based on.
> > >
> > > That's what I created the
On 3/25/20, 4:46 PM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
> What I want to know is what the Maven commands should be to create a
> release in this "conventional process" you are referring to.
>
If you want to know what's the conventional maven process is, I think I can
ask Chris
Hi Alex,
El mié., 25 mar. 2020 a las 22:43, Alex Harui ()
escribió:
> Carlos,
>
> When I wrote "from a local machine" that means to use whatever computer
> you want to use and not the CI server or steps. ç
maybe I there's a communication problem, but what I said is that I used my
local machin
Carlos,
When I wrote "from a local machine" that means to use whatever computer you
want to use and not the CI server or steps. What I want to know is what the
Maven commands should be to create a release in this "conventional process" you
are referring to.
Maybe someone else can explain bett
Hi Alex,
El mié., 25 mar. 2020 a las 21:26, Alex Harui ()
escribió:
> Carlos,
>
> I'm pretty sure that part of the "conventional process" you want to try
> requires filling the staging repo from a local machine.
>
This is what we already did. If you go to [1] will see [2]. That was the
upload of
> matter
> > > which tool it is based on.
> > >
> > > That's what I created the google doc for.
> > >
> > > If you decide to loosen the requirement on sticking 100% to
the
process, no
> > matter
> > > which tool it is based on.
> > >
> > > That's what I created the google doc for.
> > >
> > > If you decide to loosen the requirement on sticking 100% to the
> &
Carlos,
I'm pretty sure that part of the "conventional process" you want to try
requires filling the staging repo from a local machine. I am suggesting that
Chris and/or you do exactly that and document the steps and have someone else
try those steps, so we can understand what that portion of
Hi Alex,
El mié., 25 mar. 2020 a las 20:37, Alex Harui ()
escribió:
> But as I suggested in my previous post, it might help to first come up
> with the set of maven commands required to reproduce (using your local
> machine) the same number of files with the same names (other than the
> version
Hi, Alex
El mié., 25 mar. 2020 a las 19:23, Alex Harui ()
escribió:
> That has nothing to do with the Ant build of release artifacts. That is
> just using Ant to run command line commands to download and verify Maven
> release artifacts. I'm pretty sure you can just look at the steps and type
>
r if you stick to the current process, it doesn't
make any
> sense for
> > me to do so.
> >
> > Looking forward to a productive discussion,
> >
> > Chris
> >
ng forward to a productive discussion,
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> > Am 25.03.20, 17:36 schrieb "Yishay Weiss"
:
> >
> > I think the focus should be to agree on the require
gt; process I am more than willing to help.
> > However if you stick to the current process, it doesn't make any
> sense for
> > me to do so.
> >
> > Looking forward to a productive discussion,
> >
> > Chri
king 100% to the
> existing
> > process I am more than willing to help.
> > However if you stick to the current process, it doesn't make any
> sense for
> > me to do so.
> >
> > Looking forward to a productive discussion
> Am 25.03.20, 17:36 schrieb "Yishay Weiss" :
>
> I think the focus should be to agree on the requirements. Whether an
> RM uses the tool created by Chris or Alex can be a matter of choice.
>
> From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>
>
>
> Am 25.03.20, 17:36 schrieb "Yishay Weiss" :
>
> I think the focus should be to agree on the requirements. Whether an
> RM uses the tool created by Chris or Alex can be a matter of choice.
>
> From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>
>
M
To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Releasing: Finally giving up
Hi,
first of all, many thanks for all the time invested by Chris this days. We
almost didn't have any normal life this latest 2'5 days, but as
pache.org>
Subject: Re: Releasing: Finally giving up
Hi,
first of all, many thanks for all the time invested by Chris this days. We
almost didn't have any normal life this latest 2'5 days, but as well many
other work (spliced in many hours in the several previous days) was
prepared to start
>
>
>
>
> We are passing in the timestamp (slightly different format, however still
> correct as we also adjusted the format-string). When building locally, the
> timestamp is exactly as the timestamp string tells the compiler. On the CI
> however there’s this 60 minute offset. I have explicitly se
Hi,
first of all, many thanks for all the time invested by Chris this days. We
almost didn't have any normal life this latest 2'5 days, but as well many
other work (spliced in many hours in the several previous days) was
prepared to start this release, so for a person out side this project, I
thin
43 matches
Mail list logo
