subject:"third party licenses examined for 3.2.11 RC2"

Re: third party licenses examined for 3.2.11 RC2

2017-09-14 Thread Puja Valiyil

I vote to make benchmarks optional. Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 14, 2017, at 3:03 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > By the letter of the law, you don't have to resolve license conflicts until > you graduate from the Incubator. > > However, the process of identifying bad

Re: third party licenses examined for 3.2.11 RC2

2017-09-14 Thread David Lotts

Here is my completed analysis of our third party licenses. Result: We have two Licenses not allowed for Apache projects. See the bottom. The question is, is this a blocker for the release? Can we make a Jira task to fix for the next version? One of them: JSON, just switched to category X

third party licenses examined for 3.2.11 RC2

2017-09-13 Thread David Lotts

Here is my analysis of our third party licenses. Using this history as a guide: https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@rya.incubator.apache.org/msg00969.html and this : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RYA-177 in order: the good, the bad, the to-do: ### BSD good from: