Hi Chris,
As a temporary solution we can use a JSON based Calcite schema feature.
https://github.com/julianhyde/incubator-calcite/blob/master/example/csv/src/test/resources/model.json
We can implement our own Schema factory and use Calcite JSON model with
additional attributes as required.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29754/
---
(Updated Jan. 31, 2015, 2:02 a.m.)
Review request for samza, Chris Riccomini,
+1
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Yi Pan nickpa...@gmail.com wrote:
+1.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Chris Riccomini criccom...@apache.org
wrote:
Hey all,
I'm planning on opening a post-0.9.0 ticket. I was going to go with
0.10.0.
Is everyone good with that? Some people are
+1
On Jan 30, 2015, at 9:22 AM, Chris Riccomini criccom...@apache.org wrote:
Hey all,
I'm planning on opening a post-0.9.0 ticket. I was going to go with 0.10.0.
Is everyone good with that? Some people are kind of finicky about
double-digit minor version numbers.
Cheers,
Chris
This isn't a huge deal for me. Since there isn't a metadata repository it makes
sense to include that kind of metadata in the query. (The database world is all
about late schema and schema on read these days, so there are plenty of
precedents in modern SQL implementations.)
We could allow
0.9 have some improvement or new feature ?
2015-01-31 9:44 GMT+08:00 Naveen Somasundaram
nsomasunda...@linkedin.com.invalid:
+1
On Jan 30, 2015, at 9:22 AM, Chris Riccomini criccom...@apache.org
wrote:
Hey all,
I'm planning on opening a post-0.9.0 ticket. I was going to go with
