Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/samza/pull/106
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
+1 (binding) from me :)
Navina
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 9:31 PM, Ignacio Solis wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> May this be the first of many SEPs... I mean just as many as needed. :-)
>
> Nacho
>
> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Kartik Paramasivam
> wrote:
> > +1 (non binding)
> >
> > Great to s
Hi everyone,
The vote on SEP-1 passes with 7 +1 votes (3 binding) and no -1.
Votes are as follows:
+1 (binding) - Navina Ramesh, Yi Pan, Yan Fang
+1 (non-binding) - Boris Shkolnik, Xinyu Liu, Renato Marroquin Mogrovejo,
Ignacio Solis
The following are the discuss and vote mail threads:
DISCUSS m
GitHub user shanthoosh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/samza/pull/108
SAMZA-1183: Fix async run loop tests
Changes
* Moved all states locally within the test methods(no global state, since
tests can be run parallely).
* Increased the timeout waiting for all
GitHub user xinyuiscool opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/samza/pull/109
Samza 1186: Rename Processor to Job
Now we have the top level Samza application, and each stage is called a
job, the previous introduced "processor" naming should be renamed as Job. This
include
Hi Maxim,
I generated, and published the Scala 2.10 artifacts to the staging
artifactory at :
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesamza-1019/
I will send out another update when we publish the actual binaries.
Thanks,
Jagadish
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Jagadish
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/samza/pull/109
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
