://reviews.apache.org/r/46287/diff/
Testing
---
A simple unit test was added.
Thanks,
Jon Bringhurst
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/40933/#review108908
---
Ship it!
- Jon Bringhurst
On Dec. 3, 2015, 11:10 p.m., Yi Pan
Hey Julian,
Most of the general discussion surrounding a high level language for Samza can
be found at:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-390
Early mockups of Yi's work on what the lower level APIs (phases after AST
rewriting) might look like can also be found at:
https://issues.apa
Hey Zach,
That's correct. You probably want to look into the following topic-level
configs:
cleanup.policy
min.cleanable.dirty.ratio
segment.ms
segment.bytes (we usually use the default value)
Also, here's some broker configs of interest that you might want to tweak
(along with the settings we
Right now we're mostly running with noop for our most recently installed SSDs.
Some older ones are running with cfq.
Early on in the development of samza-kv, I tried deadline and noop (in place of
cfq) and didn't notice a significant change in performance. However, I don't
have any numbers to b