Hey Julian,
+1 I'm not sure if we actually *are* using the right terminology, but I
agree that Azure's terminology is what we should use. I think this was
discussed in SAMZA-390 briefly. In any case, I agree.
Cheers,
Chris
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Julian Hyde jul...@hydromatic.net
+1 on consolidating the terminology as well. Azure's definition looks good
to me.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Chris Riccomini criccom...@apache.org
wrote:
Hey Julian,
+1 I'm not sure if we actually *are* using the right terminology, but I
agree that Azure's terminology is what we should
+1 on using the right terminology.
Navina
On 2/17/15, 9:33 AM, Yi Pan nickpa...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 on consolidating the terminology as well. Azure's definition looks good
to me.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Chris Riccomini criccom...@apache.org
wrote:
Hey Julian,
+1 I'm not sure if we