Hi Regina,
On Wednesday, 2009-04-15 22:35:14 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
> I have a look at the function POISSON for issue
> http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69069
>
> The bug is easy to fix, I have tested my solution already and it work so
> far,
> but I have some questions
Hi,
On Sunday, 2009-04-19 20:35:09 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
> > I can set the result to 0 or set "illegal argument" or perhaps set
> > "infinity". Please decide.
>
> I think letting the calculation just run into an error the same as
> occurs for the expression =0^-1 in ScInterpreter::ScExp()
Hi Regina,
On Monday, 2009-04-13 22:42:07 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
> besides the UI-name problem I come across two other questions.
For clarification: we're talking about ODF FDIST here, as opposed to
LEGACY.FDIST
> (1)
> If the numerator degrees of freedom (r1) is 1, then the density func
Hi Regina,
chiming in late on this..
On Wednesday, 2009-04-08 16:02:31 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Leonard Mada schrieb:
>> I would suggest DISTF().
>
> It would be short and reflects the change in tail. But I worry, that
> people will not remember which one is 'right tail' and which one i
