Just dropping in to second the GitFlow strategy. I think it fits quite well
with what we want to do.
On 2024/01/17 00:17:23 Stepheny Perez wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I propose we discuss and stick to a version control management practice
> across all SDAP repos moving forward. Currently, our
Thanks Nga, let's proceed with gitflow for now. I'll work on updating our SDAP
repositories to this practice.
Stepheny
On 2024/01/17 22:18:16 Nga Chung wrote:
> I have not used trunk-based development myself, but I think the
> GitFlow strategy might suit SDAP development better (at least for
>
I have not used trunk-based development myself, but I think the
GitFlow strategy might suit SDAP development better (at least for
now). Currently, SDAP repos don't have the automated tests, code
coverage, etc. that is necessary for continuous integration to work.
Best,
Nga
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024
Hi everyone,
I propose we discuss and stick to a version control management practice across
all SDAP repos moving forward. Currently, our repos are all using different
branching strategies which makes development and release management difficult.
I've personally used
