Re: Review Request 46542: SENTRY-583: Add boundary condition test coverage to HDFS synchronization test suite around max #of groups

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46542/ --- (Updated April 21, 2016, 11:47 p.m.) Review request for sentry, Hao Hao and

Re: FAQs?

Never mind. I created an account on Confluence. I'll add the page later. On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Bhooshan Mogal wrote: > Thanks. Yes, it would be helpful to throw an appropriate error message. > The problem though is we have to presume that the service and the

Re: FAQs?

Thanks. Yes, it would be helpful to throw an appropriate error message. The problem though is we have to presume that the service and the client use different sentry-site.xmls. In the service process, you do not have access to the client sentry-site.xml and vice versa. So I don't think there is a

Re: FAQs?

Thanks Anne. Like I said, I'm pretty sure what's going on. But it seems very unlikely that we could add a fix for this in Sentry, since the error occurs in the thrift communication between SentryService and SentryGenericServiceClientDefultImpl. To me, this seemed like a good candidate for some

Re: FAQs?

Hi Bhooshan, Thanks for reporting this issue. If you have clear idea of what's going on, since you've spent time debugging the code, please feel free to create a jira (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY/) then post a fix. Committers will be very happy to do the code review. Best, Anne