Hi folks,
We are looking into some alternate design choices for HDFS Sentry sync to
be able to maintain the edit logs of both path updates(coming from HMS) and
perm updates (coming from Sentry) in a persistent state. The main
motivation is to make the HA cases more stable, as making the services a
> On May 3, 2016, 12:21 a.m., Gregory Chanan wrote:
> > Note: these comments are based on the assumption you are implementing this
> > at the client layer. See my previous comments for why I think it's a
> > better idea right now to do this at the ProviderBackend layer.
As the code has entire
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46909/
---
(Updated May 5, 2016, 9:44 p.m.)
Review request for sentry, Dapeng Sun, Gregory
Have you tried enabling kerberos debugging on the server side?
On May 5, 2016 10:50 AM, "Sravya Tirukkovalur" wrote:
> Forwarding it to dev@s.a.o instead of dev@s.i.a.o
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Sravya Tirukkovalur
> Date: Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 2:51 PM
> Subject: Sentry
Hi Sravya,
I think the latter approach may be easier to manage. And if we keep the
‘design_doc’ label, it may provide a more convenient way for people to
check the design doc at any time. Thanks!
Best,
Hao
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Sravya Tirukkovalur
wrote:
> Thats a great suggestion H
Thats a great suggestion Hao! I think we can achieve that by using labels.
But I am wondering what would the suggested workflow look like?
Label new feature jiras with "Design_review" and remove it when we have an
agreement on the design? One problem is design can be changed until the
patch is comm
Forwarding it to dev@s.a.o instead of dev@s.i.a.o
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sravya Tirukkovalur
Date: Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 2:51 PM
Subject: Sentry web server - Spnego
To: dev
Hi Dapeng,
I am trying to use Sentry webserver in kerberos mode according to
https://cwiki.apache.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/47012/
---
(Updated May 5, 2016, 1:59 p.m.)
Review request for sentry.
Repository: sentr
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45550/
---
(Updated May 5, 2016, 1:30 p.m.)
Review request for sentry.
Repository: sentr
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/47012/
---
Review request for sentry.
Repository: sentry
Description
---
Sentry sup
10 matches
Mail list logo
