Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Sentry version 2.0.0

Thanks Kalyan - will you also promote the 2.0.0 maven artifacts as part of the release process? Colm. On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Kalyan Kumar Kalvagadda < kkal...@cloudera.com> wrote: > Voting is now closed and has passed with the following tally, > > Binding +1s: Sergio Pena, Alexander

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Sentry version 2.0.0

Thanks Kalyan! On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Kalyan Kumar Kalvagadda < kkal...@cloudera.com> wrote: > Voting is now closed and has passed with the following tally, > > Binding +1s: Sergio Pena, Alexander Kolbasov, Colm o hEigeartaigh > > > Thanks to everyone who voted! I'll continue with the

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Sentry version 2.0.0

Voting is now closed and has passed with the following tally, Binding +1s: Sergio Pena, Alexander Kolbasov, Colm o hEigeartaigh Thanks to everyone who voted! I'll continue with the rest of the release process. -Kalyan

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Sentry version 2.0.0 RC2

Cancelling the vote for 2.0.0 RC2 as an issue has been identified. Binding -1's: Colm O hEigeartaigh I will start voting process for a new candidate. -Kalyan

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry version 2.0.0

I will start the voting for RC2 addressing the concerns. -Kalyan On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Alexander Kolbasov wrote: > Given that the licensing exercise isn't complete, I suggest revoking the > vote on the release until it is complete. > > - Alex > > On Thu, Nov 30,

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry version 2.0.0

Given that the licensing exercise isn't complete, I suggest revoking the vote on the release until it is complete. - Alex On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Kalyan Kumar Kalvagadda < kkal...@cloudera.com> wrote: > here are my next steps towards being compliant to apache licensing > > 1. Stop

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry version 2.0.0

here are my next steps towards being compliant to apache licensing 1. Stop distributing jar which are licensed under GPL and LGPL only as they are not allowed to be distributed. (Please refer http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a) 2. See if we can stop distributing jars which are

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry version 2.0.0

Hi Kalyan, You need to read the following page, which lays it all out: https://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html In particular, there are two things you need to do: a) Go through the list of dependencies and isolate the non-Apache licensed jars. Include that license in a "licenses"

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry version 2.0.0

When I enable Web UI I have this exception that I posted here. It goes away when web UI is disabled. The exception is the same whether I run from the target directory in a branch or using downloaded bits. - Alex On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Sergio Pena wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry version 2.0.0

There is one more blocker for Sentry 2.0 that needs to be committed, can someone help me review this patch? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-2079 I am able to configure Sentry 2.0 without other issues now. I can also enable the Sentry Web UI. What problems do you guys have with the

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry version 2.0.0

I have gathered all license information for all the dependencies using license-maven-plugin. Here is the file attached. Is there a particular format I should be using to update the license file in the repo? -Kalyan On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry version 2.0.0

Hi Kalyan, Anything Apache related you can immediately discount - so Hadoop, Hive, HBase, Solr, Zookeeper, etc. I would suggest just deleting those jars from the list and googling the remaining jars to see what the license is. Colm. On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 6:55 PM, Kalyan Kumar Kalvagadda <

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry version 2.0.0

Could it be caused by the fact there are multiple Servlet API jars in lib? Colm. On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 7:04 PM, Alexander Kolbasov wrote: > I downloaded binary version that Kalyan posted and run it and got the same > problem. > > Here is my java information: > > java

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry version 2.0.0

I downloaded binary version that Kalyan posted and run it and got the same problem. Here is my java information: java version "1.8.0_101" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_101-b13) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.101-b13, mixed mode) The sentry process is still running

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry version 2.0.0

I'm trying to gather the license information for the dependencies. I'm trying to use Apache Maven Project Info Reports Plugin . Does anyone has a better suggestion? -Kalyan On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Sergio Pena

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry version 2.0.0

I don't have that issue. I downloaded the 2.0 tar.gz that is already signed and install it on an Ubuntu 16.04 machine with Hive 2.3.2. It has been running in a single node mode. I could check HMS notifications being pulled and updated, and checking the permissions. On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:20

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry version 2.0.0

Sergio, I know that you tried to start sentry standalone, Did you see this issue? -Kalyan On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Alexander Kolbasov wrote: > I tried to start Sentry server on Mac and got a weird error . I am running > from the dist directory that I just built

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry version 2.0.0

I tried to start Sentry server on Mac and got a weird error . I am running from the dist directory that I just built with mvn clean install on the 2.0.0 branch. 17/11/29 10:13:25 ERROR thrift.SentryService: Error starting server java.lang.SecurityException: class "javax.servlet.DispatcherType"'s

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry version 2.0.0

Kalyan, Thank you for posting Release 2.0 candidate. What kind if testing would you recommend for us to perform to vote Yes/No? Can you post some recommendations, please? - Alex On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Kalyan Kumar Kalvagadda < kkal...@cloudera.com> wrote: > This is the release of

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry version 2.0.0

Agree with Colm. The licensing issues could be a problem for the official release, so we should address them. I've seen other components blocking releases due to licensing issues. On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > If you are happy with the

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry version 2.0.0

Hi Kalyan, Why do we vote on source + bin distributions that are copied to a local directory, when they are available in maven here? https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesentry-1005/org/apache/sentry/sentry-dist/2.0.0/ I found a minor problem in that some test

[VOTE] Release Sentry version 2.0.0

This is the release of Apache Sentry, version 2.0.0. It fixes the following issues: *https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SENTRY/versions/12341081 * Source and bin files :