+1
This needs to be handled asap, if the official website
and servicecomb-java-chassis-doc are not synchronized, it will mislead
users and affect the user experience.
2018-07-11 10:20 GMT+08:00 bismy :
> Agree with your idea
>
>
>
>
> -- 原始邮件 --
> 发件人: "Zen Lin";
In my opinion, users' confidence in the project comes from the project
maturity assessment report, so I think it is better to reflect users' use
in the report rather than the github page.
Now,there are about 5 Huawei departments and other 10 companies are using
ServiceComb,they are Huawei Cloud
Hi All,
As we have continously put an effort to improve the Service-Center UI to
make it more usable and user friendly, going forwards I would like to
propose some major changes in the Design of frontend. Some of those changes
will include :
1. Update Dashboard to have a more better snapshot of
Yeah, we are heading to TLP.
Current we are planing release ServiceComb Service-Center 1.0.0,
SerivceComb Java-Chassis 1.0.0 this month.
The ServiceComb trademark transfer process looks good.
And we make consensus decisions through the discussion - vote process.
Willem Jiang
Twitter:
Hi, gang!
I'm thinking about handling configs of both ServiceComb and other
frameworks(like Istio), then provide a unified solution for config
management, to support the hybrid solution scenario(like, user use
ServiceComb and Istio at the same time).
So the first thing to do is to make