Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for Re-Design of Service-Center Frontend

There is a vote of Service-Center 1.0.0, please spend some time play with it. Now we just need to make sure the UI is work as we expected. Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Bin Ma wrote: > About the new Service-Center UI, some ideas from

Re: Discussion about java chassis roadmap

currently, just discuss what will be done in next stage when will the issues will be implemented discussed after "what" is clear? 2018-07-23 9:35 GMT+08:00 Zen Lin : > I am sorry I can not get the information about which version will fix > these issues. > Shall we fix all these epic issues in

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for Re-Design of Service-Center Frontend

About the new Service-Center UI, some ideas from the user's point of view, 1. The function of the old UI is stable at 1.0.0-m2, including featrures and configuration files. The new UI should provide stable and usable features, and do not displayed test phase featrures in the UI interface to avoid

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating) version 1.0.0

-1 Several third-party libraries were added but not included in LICENSE file. github.com/karlseguin/ccache github.com/gorilla/websocket css-percentage-circle vis On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 10:16 AM bismy wrote: > +1 > Check the release notes and run some test to binaries. > > > One small

Re: Discussion about java chassis roadmap

I am sorry I can not get the information about which version will fix these issues. Shall we fix all these epic issues in release 1.0.0, or other later release. Or we will break these epic issues into smaller one ,and then mark which part of the issues will be fixed in release 1.0.0? Best

Re: Re: [DISCUSS]Shall we upgrade Java-chassis to support Spring Boot2

I think we also have a sub-task of support Spring Boot 2 , which is add Spring Boot 2.X option in start.servicecomb.io . Zen Lin 于2018年7月23日周一 上午9:15写道： > +1 to Willem's suggestion. > Could someone ask yaohaishi to create a issue track for this, upgrade to > support Spring Boot2. > And when

Re: Re: [DISCUSS]Shall we upgrade Java-chassis to support Spring Boot2

+1 to Willem's suggestion. Could someone ask yaohaishi to create a issue track for this, upgrade to support Spring Boot2. And when he find an actual issue on testing it, can create a sub issue under the issue of "upgrade to support Spring Boot2". Thus, Mabin and the users can know the detail

Re: Discussion about java chassis roadmap

adjust roadmap, remove SCB-759, add SCB-770: [SCB-748 ] ServiceComb engine resource optimize [SCB-756 ] improve development phase flexibility [SCB-719 ]