Well, this is fine and I think we have the same conclusion.
We implement this behavior according to mail I send before.
> >a. JAX-RS defaults: required=false and defalutValue not specified
> >b. Spring MVC default: required=true adefalutValue not specifiednd
@mahesh How do you
in jaxrs mode, required default to false, if primitive type not annotated
by @DefaultValue, should generated defaultValue to swagger
in springmvc mode, not support standard jaxrs behavior, so we no need to
process it. (if not consider compatible to standard springmvc, i feel that
standard jaxrs
SCB-575 still in OPEN status
2018-07-27 8:55 GMT+08:00 wjm wjm :
> SCB-592 also have won't fix problem
>
> it's better everybody check their own issues
>
SCB-592 also have won't fix problem
it's better everybody check their own issues
+1 binding
1. check release notes and binaries. [OK]
2. run test case using windows version. [OK]
2018-07-26 22:32 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang :
> +1 binding
>
> I checked：
> - hashes and signatures looks good
> - DISCLAIMER/NOTICE/LICENSE looks good
> - can make build the kit from source
> -
infact, in springboot2 reactive stack, it's also not compatible:
- can not use servlet request and response, must switch to new class
- can not use selvlet filters
all mechanism about servlet
we are similar, if customer want to use servlet stack, then use them as
before, but if DO
+1
It would be great to have at least meeting notes on the mailing list.
Regards
JB
On 26/07/2018 14:43, Willem Jiang wrote:
> +1, it's great that we can hold this kind of meet up.
>
>
> Willem Jiang
>
> Twitter: willemjiang
> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 9:17 PM, Mohammad
+1 binding.
I checked:
- hashes and signatures are good
- DISCLAIMER exists , NOTICE/LICENSE looks good
- can build the kit from source
- git tag is write
- Running the Company example with the stage repo without any error.
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Wed, Jul 25,
For the normal user, they just want to use the session information as they
use in the web container.
It could be great if we can still support spring session out of box.
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:03 PM, wjm wjm wrote:
> java chassis
java chassis invocation context is easier than session
but in edge, if we provide a distributed session, that can make manage
session easier.
2018-07-26 17:58 GMT+08:00 bismy :
> Java Chassis now do not provide a easy session management but do give a
> suggestion to manage it at edge service[1].
对英语停用
+1, it's great help to promote ServiceComb
2018-07-26 20:48 GMT+08:00 bismy :
> +1, it's great help to promote ServiceComb
>
>
>
>
> -- 原始邮件 --
> 发件人: "willem.jiang";
> 发送时间: 2018年7月26日(星期四) 晚上8:43
> 收件人: "dev";
>
> 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for holding
" e. when generating swagger, generate defalutValue only when explicitly
specified."
add another point:
for primitive type, even there is no @DefaultValue annotation, should have
it's default value
2018-07-26 19:42 GMT+08:00 bismy :
> My suggestions are as follows
> 1. Encourage providers to
FYI,
I just transfer those repos into go-chassis group.
https://github.com/ServiceComb/go-chassis
https://github.com/ServiceComb/cse-collector
https://github.com/ServiceComb/go-cc-client
https://github.com/ServiceComb/go-archaius
https://github.com/ServiceComb/go-sc-client
+1, it's great that we can hold this kind of meet up.
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 9:17 PM, Mohammad Asif Siddiqui <
asifdxtr...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As a Bangalore is known as a Sillicon Valley of India which is a home for
> millions
+1 binding
Checks I have done.
1. check the release notes. [OK]
2. check the binaries and sources.[OK]
3. Integrate the candidate to run all integration tests passed. [OK]
-- --
??: "Mohammad Asif Siddiqui";
: 2018??7??25??(??) 5:09
+1 non binding
Checks done:
- hashes and signatures good
- DISCLAIMER/NOTICE/LICENSE exists
- Ran UT and IT
- ran RAT tool
- can make release kit from source
- Ran sample demos with using service center.
- Source file have ASF headers
Regards
-Mahesh Raju S
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:19 PM
My suggestions are as follows
1. Encourage providers to specify required & defalutValue explicitly.
a. when required=true and defaultValue is given, if consumers do not give a
value, use default value;
b. when required=true and defaultValue is not given, if consumers do not
give a value,
Java Chassis now do not provide a easy session management but do give a
suggestion to manage it at edge service[1].
If we need to think about Spring Session, we should think about how to use
Session API like HttpSession. But java chassis is not a J2EE implementation.
Do we implement a
After went through the code, it looks like the PR[1] was not merged into
master branch.
[1]https://github.com/vert-x3/vertx-web/pull/950
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 4:35 PM, wjm wjm wrote:
> by ClusteredSessionStore, vertx can also do this
>
+1 binding
1. check the UI topology BUG is fixed
2. the use cases ars passed
-- --
??: "Mohammad Asif Siddiqui";
: 2018??7??26??(??) 3:45
??: "dev";
: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating)
by ClusteredSessionStore, vertx can also do this
but currently, there is no a official IMPL:
https://github.com/vert-x3/vertx-web/issues/890
2018-07-26 15:31 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang :
> Hi team,
>
> Today I had a quick talk with the custom who is quite interested about take
> the session out from
oh yes, i had new an issue for it
Log print more detailed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCB-776
-- --
??: "willem.jiang";
: 2018??7??26??(??) 3:44
??: "dev";
: Re: Cannot find the instance in ServiceComb
+1 binding
Checks I did:
- hashes and signatures is good
- DISCLAIMER/NOTICE/LICENSE exists
- ran RAT tool
- can make release kit from source
- checked for archive matching git tag
- Source file have ASF headers
- Ran UT using source
Regards
Asif
On 2018/07/25 09:09:52,
+1 binding
Checks I did:
- hashes and signatures is good
- DISCLAIMER/NOTICE/LICENSE exists
- ran RAT tool
- can make release kit from source
- checked for archive matching git tag
- Source file have ASF headers
- Ran the java-chassis and go-chassis demo's.
- Ran Integration
Oh, it's my bad change the saga discovery servicecenter to development mode.
Thx Sure for your help.
>From the log, I cannot tell it's the development issue, can we polish the
logger file to make it easy for user to dig the issue?
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Thu, Jul
sorry, not the car service env mismatch, it is saga-service env mismatch
-- --
??: "Sure";
: 2018??7??26??(??) 3:37
??: "dev@servicecomb.apache.org";
: ?? Cannot find the instance in ServiceComb Discovery
this is
this is the environment isolation problem. i have check the ci log and found
that the car-rental-service is registered in development environment but other
services are registered in ''(default) environment. so it will fail when car
service discovery hotal service instances from SC.
Hi team,
Today I had a quick talk with the custom who is quite interested about take
the session out from the single server to the redis cluster with the help
of Spring session. In this way they can build the stateless services
without changing any application code.
I just checked the Spring
Hi All,
Currently we are handling the issue related to swagger parameter default values
while generating the swagger content.
Default value annotation(@DefaultValue) we can provide for PathParam,
QueryParam, MatrixParam, CookieParam, FormParam and HeaderParam.
The query is when to consider
29 matches
Mail list logo
