Re: [discuss][java-chassis] change core mechanism from strong typetoweak type

2019-02-13 Thread Willem Jiang
+1 to create a branch to try it. BTW, we could get some feedback from community if we could write some user guide for it. If there is some changes need user to do some migration works, we need to specify those changes in the document. Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Thu, Feb

Re: [discuss][java-chassis] change core mechanism from strong typetoweak type

2019-02-13 Thread wjm wjm
conclusion: before finish all feature of weak type, all related PR will be merged to new branch: weak-type wjm wjm 于2019年2月14日周四 上午1:27写道: > > > bismy 于2019年2月12日周二 下午3:19写道: > >> - javaTypes >>in org.apache.servicecomb.swagger.invocation.response.ResponseMeta not >>always avaiable,

Re: [discuss][java-chassis] change core mechanism from strong typetoweak type

2019-02-13 Thread wjm wjm
bismy 于2019年2月12日周二 下午3:19写道: > - javaTypes >in org.apache.servicecomb.swagger.invocation.response.ResponseMeta not >always avaiable,maybe will affect filters and handlers > This is rarely used, I think. > yes, but app market already used it. >- > org

Re: [DISCUSSION] create a new project servicecomb-samples

2019-02-13 Thread zhang_...@boco.com.cn
This is a good idea, It's easier for users to find examples coolbeevip BOCO > 在 2019年2月13日,下午2:38,Willem Jiang 写道: > > Do we have any conclusion of this proposal? > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 3:34 PM bismy