+1 binding,
I've checked maven build.
Replied Message
| From | liubao |
| Date | 07/02/2024 16:27 |
| To | dev@servicecomb.apache.org |
| Cc | |
| Subject | [VOTE]Release Apache ServiceComb Java Chassis version 2.8.18 |
Hello All,
This is a call for a Vote to release Apache
+1 binding.
I've checked maven build.
Replied Message
| From | liubao |
| Date | 07/02/2024 11:40 |
| To | dev@servicecomb.apache.org |
| Cc | |
| Subject | [VOTE]Release Apache ServiceComb Java Chassis version 3.2.0 |
Hello All,
This is a call for a Vote to release Apache ServiceComb
+1 binding.
I've checked:
- git tag seems ok,
- mvn test build pass.
Replied Message
| From | ZhangJian He |
| Date | 06/06/2024 09:13 |
| To | dev@servicecomb.apache.org |
| Cc | |
| Subject | Re: [VOTE]Release Apache ServiceComb Java Chassis version 3.1.2 |
+1 (binding)
Thanks
+1,
I have checked mvn building and git tag, and all seems OK.
Replied Message
| From | bismy |
| Date | 12/18/2023 12:01 |
| To | dev |
| Cc | |
| Subject | [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version 2.8.14 |
Hello All,
This is a call for a Vote to release Apache
+1,
I have check the build and UT, and all seem OK.
Replied Message
| From | bismy |
| Date | 11/14/2023 21:06 |
| To | dev |
| Cc | |
| Subject | [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version 2.8.13 |
Hello All,
This is a call for a Vote to release Apache ServiceComb
+1 binding,
the maven building and tag seems OK.
Replied Message
| From | bismy |
| Date | 10/10/2023 20:22 |
| To | dev |
| Cc | |
| Subject | [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version 2.8.12 |
Hello All,
This is a call for a Vote to release Apache ServiceComb
+1 binding,
I have checked,
1. the maven building is OK,
2. git tag seems OK.
回复的原邮件
| 发件人 | Willem Jiang |
| 日期 | 2023年06月23日 19:58 |
| 收件人 | dev@servicecomb.apache.org |
| 抄送至 | |
| 主题 | Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version 2.8.9 (RC2) |
+1 (binding)
Willem
+1 binding,
I have checked,
maven build seems OK,
git tag seems OK.
Replied Message
| From | bismy |
| Date | 05/25/2023 17:22 |
| To | dev |
| Cc | |
| Subject | [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version 2.8.8 |
Hello All,
This is a call for a Vote to release Apache
+1
I have checked,
- maven build is OK,
- git tag seems OK
Replied Message
| From | ZhangJian He |
| Date | 05/07/2023 12:56 |
| To | dev@servicecomb.apache.org |
| Cc | |
| Subject | Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version 2.8.7 |
+1. I have done check tags, run
+1
I have checked
- maven build is OK,
- git tag seems OK
Replied Message
| From | bismy |
| Date | 05/06/2023 21:35 |
| To | dev |
| Cc | |
| Subject | [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version 2.8.7 |
Hello All,
This is a call for a Vote to release Apache ServiceComb
+1 binding,
I've checked,
maven building and tests passed,
git tag seems OK.
Replied Message
| From | ZhangJian He |
| Date | 02/02/2023 14:18 |
| To | dev@servicecomb.apache.org |
| Cc | |
| Subject | Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version 2.8.5 |
+1 non-binding
+1 binding.
I have checked,
the mvn build and tests are OK,
the tag seems OK
Replied Message
| From | bismy |
| Date | 12/28/2022 18:08 |
| To | dev |
| Cc | |
| Subject | [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version 2.8.4 |
Hello All,
This is a call for a Vote to release
+1 binding,
I've checked the git tag, maven building and tests
Replied Message
| From | bismy |
| Date | 11/05/2022 15:31 |
| To | dev |
| Cc | |
| Subject | [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version 2.8.2 |
Hello All,
This is a call for a Vote to release Apache
+1 binding,
I've checked the git tag, maven building and tests
Replied Message
| From | bismy |
| Date | 11/05/2022 10:44 |
| To | dev |
| Cc | |
| Subject | [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version 1.3.10 |
Hello All,
This is a call for a Vote to release Apache
+1 binding,
I have checked,
the maven build and tests have passed,
and the git tag seems OK.
Replied Message
| From | bismy |
| Date | 10/23/2022 12:22 |
| To | dev |
| Cc | |
| Subject | [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version 2.8.1 |
Hello All,
This is a call for a
+1 binding,
I've checked,
maven build and tests have passed,
the git tag seems OK.
Replied Message
| From | bismy |
| Date | 09/29/2022 21:03 |
| To | dev |
| Cc | |
| Subject | [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version 1.3.9 |
Hello All,
This is a call for a Vote to
+1 binding,
I've checked,
maven build and tests have passed,
git tag seems OK.
Replied Message
| From | bismy |
| Date | 09/29/2022 20:14 |
| To | dev |
| Cc | |
| Subject | [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version 2.8.0 |
Hello All,
This is a call for a Vote to release
+1 binding,
I have checked,
maven build and tests have passed,
tag and commitId seems OK
Replied Message
| From | bismy |
| Date | 09/13/2022 17:51 |
| To | dev |
| Cc | |
| Subject | [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version 2.7.10 |
Hello All,
This is a call for a
+1 binding，
I have checked,
maven build and test pass,
commit and tag seems OK
Replied Message
| From | bismy |
| Date | 08/30/2022 16:53 |
| To | dev |
| Cc | |
| Subject | [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version 1.3.8 |
Hello All,
This is a call for a Vote to release
+1 binding,
I have checked,
1. maven build and test passed,
2. tag seems OK.
Replied Message
| From | bismy |
| Date | 08/27/2022 23:47 |
| To | dev |
| Cc | |
| Subject | [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version 2.7.9 |
Hello All,
This is a call for a Vote to release
+1 binding
I have checked:
- build is OK and tests passed,
- tag and release notes seems OK,
- commitId matches.
Replied Message
| From | bismy |
| Date | 08/11/2022 23:36 |
| To | dev |
| Cc | |
| Subject | Re:[VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version 2.7.8 |
This is my
+1 binding
tag and release notes seems OK, commitId matches.
Replied Message
| From | Jimin Wu |
| Date | 06/10/2022 09:40 |
| To | dev@servicecomb.apache.org |
| Cc | |
| Subject | Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version 2.7.4 |
+1 binding
+1 bind
I've checked maven build and integration tests.
| ?? | bismy |
| | 2022??04??16?? 14:57 |
| ?? | dev |
| ?? | |
| | ?? [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version 2.7.1 |
This is my +1.
--
+1 binding
I have checked maven build and integration test, and it seems Okay.
回复的原邮件
| 发件人 | bismy |
| 日期 | 2022年04月02日 18:27 |
| 收件人 | dev |
| 抄送至 | |
| 主题 | [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version 2.7.0 |
Hello All,
This is a call for a Vote to release Apache
+1 binding
I have checked,
1, git tag and commit id match
2, mvn clean install -Pit is OK
回复的原邮件
| 发件人 | Willem Jiang |
| 日期 | 2022年03月16日 14:50 |
| 收件人 | dev |
| 抄送至 | |
| 主题 | Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version 2.6.3 |
+1 （binding）
Willem Jiang
Twitter:
+1 binding
I've checked,
1. mvn clean install -Pit is OK
2. tag matches commit id
回复的原邮件
| 发件人 | Willem Jiang |
| 日期 | 2022年03月16日 14:51 |
| 收件人 | dev |
| 抄送至 | |
| 主题 | Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version 1.3.7 |
+1 （binding）
Willem Jiang
Twitter:
Welcome aboard! Congratulations!
| |
yhs0092
|
|
邮箱：yhs0...@163.com
|
签名由 网易邮箱大师 定制
On 02/15/2022 18:57, Sure wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache ServiceComb
has invited Yasheng Tang[1] to become a committer and we are pleased
to announce that he has accepted.
[1] https
+1 binding
I have checked,
1. local build is OK
2. sha512sum and gpg signature is OK
3. src package contents comparing to github repo is OK
| |
yhs0092
|
|
邮箱：yhs0...@163.com
|
签名由 网易邮箱大师 定制
On 11/25/2021 14:46, bismy wrote:
Hello All,
This is a call for a Vote to release Apache ServiceComb
[ ] +0 No Opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because
On the behalf of ServiceComb Team
Liu Bao
| |
yhs0092
|
|
邮箱：yhs0...@163.com
|
签名由 网易邮箱大师 定制
+1
I've checked,
1. the release candidate's sha512 checksum
2. commit id and tag
3. release notes
it seems fine for me
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
At 2021-02-18 16:46:59, "Xiaoliang Tian" wrote:
>Hi All,
>
> This is a call for Vote to release Apache ServiceComb Kie version
+1 binding
I have checked,
local build is OK,
tag and commitId is OK.
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
At 2020-11-27 17:10:16, "bismy" wrote:
>Hello All,
>
>This is a call for a Vote to release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version
>2.1.3
>
>Release Notes :
+1
I have checked,
local build is OK,
tag and commitId is OK.
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
At 2020-08-12 11:09:50, "bismy" wrote:
>Hello All,
>
>This is a call for a Vote to release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version
>2.1.1
>
>Release Notes :
+1 binding
I have checked,
1. Release commit id and Tag are good.
2. mvn clean install -Pit build is good.
3. source code of Release Candidate is consistent with GitHub code repo.
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
At 2020-06-29 11:11:18, "Yang Bo" wrote:
>+1 Binding.
>
>Build from
+1 binding
I have checked,
1. Release commit id and Tag are good.
2. mvn clean install -Pit build is good.
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 5/11/2020 07:49，Willem Jiang wrote：
+1. （Binding)
Here are my checked,
1. Signature and Hashed are good.
2. Release commit and Tag are
Congratulations! Welcome!
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 5/11/2020 17:28，victor chan wrote：
Congratulations！
Wishes & Regards
---
Chenzhu
Xiaoliang Tian 于2020年5月11日周一 下午4:42写道：
welcome
Daniel Qian 于 2020年5月10日周日 10:24写道：
Congrats and
+1
Checks done:
- git tag and commit id is OK.
- mvn clean install -Pit build OK.
- basic function checked pass.
- the release candidate of source is OK.
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 2/17/2020 16:07，bismy wrote：
Hello All,
This is a call for a Vote to release Apache
+1 binding
I checked,
+ git tag and the commit id are matched
+ release candidates and the checksum files are OK
+ building from the source files is OK
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 12/31/2019 18:18，sen sun wrote：
Hi All,
This is a call for Vote to release Apache
Congratulations! Welcome!
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
在2019年12月23日 14:32，Bin Ma 写道：
Please join me and the rest of the ServiceComb PMC members in welcoming our
new ServiceComb committer: Sun Lisen(孙丽森).
Sun Lisen has been around the ServiceComb almost a year by
contributing
Hi, maybe use Clock.systemDefaultZone() is okay? Users will specify the JVM
timezone if necessary.
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 12/12/2019 16:50??Ang Li wrote??
Hi Team,
I am currently solving issue
[SBC-1559](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCB-1559). The core idea
Hello, I find that the `mvn clean install` build is not OK in my development
environment. I use a Windows computer to run it.
Here is the error log:
```
[INFO] Running org.apache.servicecomb.toolkit.cli.CliTest
[ERROR] Tests run: 6, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.884 s
<<<
This is the content of the mail "[DISCUSSION] Rsocket is hot now" from gylgeek .
There seems some problem with his mailbox : )
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
- Forwarded Message -
From： gylg...@gmail.com
Date： 12/4/2019 17:50
To：
Subject： [DISCUSSION] Rsocket
+1 for removing spring 4 and springboot 1 from java-chassis 2.0. And I think
they should still be kept in java-chassis 1.
By the way, when do we checkout the java-chassis 1.x branch? As Liubao
mentioned the 1.x branch is the maintenance branch for java-chassis 1, but I
cannot find this one in
Congratulations! Welcome!
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
在2019年11月8日 08:02，Willem Jiang 写道：
Please join me and the rest of the ServiceComb PMC members in welcoming our
new ServiceComb committer: Daniel Qian (钱嘉）
Daniel Qian has been around the ServiceComb for more than one years
That's great! Thank you for your contribution.
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 10/17/2019 15:22，Ang Li wrote：
Hi Team:
I found some code implementations need to be optimized in
servicecomb-java-chassis and created a jira issue to track:
+1
Great work!
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 10/15/2019 16:59??Ang Li wrote??
+1
Sounds Great!
--Original--
From:"Willem
iday, 6nd September, 2019) and will remain open
> for at-least 72 hours, Request all PMC members to give their vote.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as 1.6.3
> [ ] +0 No Opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because
>
> On the behalf of ServiceComb Team
>
>
> Best Wishes & Regards
> Xiaoliang Tian
| |
yhs0092
|
|
邮箱：yhs0...@163.com
|
签名由 网易邮箱大师 定制
+1
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 9/5/2019 01:33，victor chan wrote：
+1
Liubao (A) 于 2019年9月4日周三 下午11:49写道：
+1
-邮件原件-
发件人: Xiaoliang Tian [mailto:xiaoliang.t...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2019年9月3日 19:27
收件人: dev
主题: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Mesher version 1.6.3
Hi
+1. Agree to enable the issue feature.
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 8/5/2019 21:08，Willem Jiang wrote：
I agree it could easy for the user to repo the bug or ask questions
through issue.
I think we can enable the issue feature of fence, toolkit, mesher,
toolkit, by default.
Congratulations!
: )
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
在2019年8月3日 18:50，Bin Ma 写道：
Thanks, very glad to be an Apache ServiceComb committer and grow with the
ServiceComb community together
Best Wishes & Regards
---
Mabin
victor chan 于2019年8月2日周五
Yes, it's not so urgent. I'll wait until the weak-type branch get merged.
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 7/7/2019 20:37，wjm wjm wrote：
seems not too urgent?
yhs0092 于2019年7月7日周日 下午12:04写道：
There are 115 problems pointed out by CheckStyle. The problem distribution
is like
weak type
branch?
yhs0092 于2019年7月5日周五 下午7:43写道：
Hi, guys. I've run code static checks for the source code of
ServiceComb-Java-Chassis and find several potential problems.
I want to raise an issue to fix these problems. The changes may be
distributed among a lot of source code files
Hi, guys. I've run code static checks for the source code of
ServiceComb-Java-Chassis and find several potential problems.
I want to raise an issue to fix these problems. The changes may be distributed
among a lot of source code files and they are all for code style and complexity
improvement.
+1
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 6/21/2019 21:54，Willem Jiang wrote：
+1.
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 4:41 PM Xiaoliang Tian wrote:
Hi All,
this is a call for vote to bring service mesh called "mesher" into
Apache Software
+1
Great work. This will make ServiceComb a cross-language microservice solution.
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 6/11/2019 10:31，Bin Ma wrote：
+1
I'm glad to hear this. I think that the Mesher can be used as a
multi-language sub-project or component, and provide a unified
+1
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 6/11/2019 09:52，Zen Lin wrote：
Hi All,
This is a call for Vote to have a Apache ServiceComb booth and hold an
Apache ServiceComb Meetup as a Co-located Event , in KubeCon &
CloudNativeCon Summit China 2019, as discussed in the proposal [1].
+1
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 6/10/2019 16:02，Zheng Feng wrote：
+1 for holding this meetup !
Zen Lin 于2019年6月10日周一 上午10:08写道：
This is a Proposal for holding a Co-Located Event in KubeCon &
CloudNativeCon Summit China 2019 to help building ServiceComb's community.
My
+1(binding)
Good work!
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 6/10/2019 10:23，wjm wjm wrote：
+1
Zen Lin 于2019年6月10日周一 上午9:49写道：
+1 (binding)
Best Regards,
---
Zen Lin
zenlintechnofr...@gmail.com
Focused on Micro Service and Apache ServiceComb
Liubao (A) 于2019年6月10日周一 上午9:09写道：
, 2019 at 5:24 PM yhs0092 wrote:
Hi guys. I've checked the situation described in this issue and the problem
indeed exists.
Maybe we can move the action of actual sending file body into
org.apache.servicecomb.common.rest.AbstractRestInvocation#onExecuteHttpServerFiltersFinish
Hi guys. I've checked the situation described in this issue and the problem
indeed exists.
Maybe we can move the action of actual sending file body into
org.apache.servicecomb.common.rest.AbstractRestInvocation#onExecuteHttpServerFiltersFinish,
and in
+1 (binding)
Checked basic function of ServiceComb-Java-Chassis
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 5/13/2019 18:16，Mohammad Asif Siddiqui wrote：
Hello All,
This is a call for a Vote to release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version
1.2.1 (RC-02)
Release Notes :
ely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 5/7/2019 21:40，yhs0092 wrote：
+1 (binding)
Checked the basic function of ServiceComb-Java-Chassis
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 5/7/2019 13:58，Mohammad Asif Siddiqui wrote：
+1 (binding)
Checks Done :
- Hashes and Signature is corr
+1 (binding)
Checked the basic function of ServiceComb-Java-Chassis
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 5/7/2019 13:58，Mohammad Asif Siddiqui wrote：
+1 (binding)
Checks Done :
- Hashes and Signature is correct
- No unexpected binaries in the release
- Archive matching
the setting in one place
which could be overridden by using the system property.
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 11:09 AM yhs0092 wrote:
Hi, currently our integration tests will run serveral microservice instances
without limiting their memory
Hi, currently our integration tests will run serveral microservice instances
without limiting their memory consumption. As a result, I have to spare quite a
large part of memory to ensure the execution of `mvn clean install -Pit` does
not fail.
Maybe we can set `-Xmx128m` to limit the heap
+1 binding
Checked code compiling
Checked basic function
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 4/9/2019 18:07，Mohammad Asif Siddiqui wrote：
+1 (binding)
Checks Done :
- hashes and signature is good.
- can compile code from source.
- git matching archive tag.
- source files have
Congratulations!
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
在2019年4月2日 15:20，Zen Lin 写道：
Congratulations!
Best Regards,
---
Zen Lin
zenlintechnofr...@gmail.com
Focused on Micro Service and Apache ServiceComb
zhaojun 于2019年4月2日周二 下午12:53写道：
Congratulations~
--
Zhao Jun
be for both development and production environment, so
must conside security problem.
currently i'm not sure what's the best way to control it.
yhs0092 于2019年3月5日周二 上午10:28写道：
That's a great idea!
What is the positioning of this feature? If it's designed for development
environment trouble-shooting, I
That's a great idea!
What is the positioning of this feature? If it's designed for development
environment trouble-shooting, I guess it's okay the web pages are provided by
the micro-service instances directly. But if this feature is expected to work
in production environment, which may
+1
It's necessary to inform users of their outdated usage.
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 1/26/2019 09:26，Willem Jiang wrote：
+1, we can add the option for the user to keep the system booting,
just like the spring-boot's new option of
A new issue[1] is created. I'll analyse the root cause later.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCB-1133
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 1/25/2019 10:46，wjm wjm wrote：
+1
but if too complex, can IMPL it in weak type engine.
yhs0092 于2019年1月25日周五 上午9:55写道：
Hello, I
Hello, I find out that currently it's not supported to define a inner class
type in the REST service class as parameter. Should we allow such use case?
For example, a REST service like below will cause javassist.NotFoundException:
training.demo.provider.service.TestRestService.TestBodyParam
I agree that current default value of thread pool size is too small, but I'm
not sure about the disadvantages of the current fixed thread pool.
Do you mean if multiple service instances is deployed on the same machine, a
fixed thread pool is not so flexible since the instances cannot clean up
Hi, wjm. Thank you for your sharing.
As you say that if CPU count is less than 8, it's suggested that the
thread-count is set to the CPU count. There is still a doubt for me. In the
synchronous mode, since the business logic runs in business thread pool, i.e.
the executor, don't we need to
+1
This is a good idea. Currently the samples of ServiceComb-Java-Chassis is mixed
in our project code, and the maven dependency management is kind of complex.
For the new comers, it's a little bit hard to understand and hard to run them.
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On
+1
It seems good.
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 12/4/2018 14:04，Mohammad Asif Siddiqui wrote：
+1
Suggestion : I guess we can re-visit and update the description of
ServiceComb.( ServiceComb is a full stack microservice framework which provides
a set of SDK's, Service
It's my honor to be the committer of ServiceComb. Thank you!
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
在2018年11月13日 11:24，赵俊 写道：
Congratulation!
On Nov 13, 2018, at 10:46 AM, Willem Jiang wrote:
Please join me and the rest of the ServiceComb PPMC members in welcoming our
new ServiceComb
Congratulations!
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
在2018年11月13日 12:12，cherrylzhao 写道：
I’m very happy to become the committer of ServiceComb!
I’d like to try my best to make saga more better!
Thanks
On Nov 13, 2018, at 11:45 AM, Willem Jiang wrote:
Please join me and the rest of
Thank Willem!
I'm submitting a commit in my next pull request to fix the site link in
Java-Chassis.
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 11/9/2018 10:55，wjm wjm wrote：
Great, thanks~
Zheng Feng 于2018年11月9日周五 上午10:43写道：
Nice work ! I just open the PR to fix in the saga [1]
[1]
is that "the request method XXX is not
allowed in upload", so that it can be used.
We are thinking about PR to vert.x, maybe we can create a PR for them to review.
-- --
??: "yhs0092";
: 2018??11??5??(??) ??
wrote??
Maybe we can send a
405 Method Not Allowed
message.
-- --
??: "yhs0092";
: 2018??11??1??(??) 8:56
??: "dev@servicecomb.apache.org";
: Re: [Discuss][JavaChassis]
t find any
better solution.
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 10/31/2018 17:54，yhs0092 wrote：
Hi, one of the JavaChassis exception wrapped in RestBodyHandler is added by me.
I will try to remove the JavaChassis exceptions in RestBodyHandler and see
whether it can works well.
Yours
Hi, one of the JavaChassis exception wrapped in RestBodyHandler is added by me.
I will try to remove the JavaChassis exceptions in RestBodyHandler and see
whether it can works well.
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 10/31/2018 09:00，wjm wjm wrote：
currently we
customized
This is a great idea! And I think we should explicitly tell users about the
priority of @RequestMapping, @RestSchema, and @RestController, no matter on the
release note or the gitbook. Since I've seen some users transform their
SpringBoot/SpringCloud project into ServiceComb and leave all of
Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 4:14 PM yhs0092 wrote:
Hi guys.
Yesterday, a user asked me about a 404 error. He packed his JavaChassis
project into a jar file and ran it on his laptop. But when he invoked the
rest interface by Postman, a 404 error was returned
+1 non-binding
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 9/17/2018 10:47??DeanLee<82529...@qq.com> wrote??
+1
Dean Lee
---Original---
From: "Lance Ju"
Date: Mon, Sep 17, 2018 10:19 AM
To:
"zhouzhongyuan666";"dev";
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache ServiceComb (incubating)
+1
Hi, Yangyong. I've tried your pull request in my Spring Boot 2 demo and it
works well, great job!
I have a little question, can we put spring-boot2-starter-servlet into the
dependencyManagement of java-chassis-dependencies-springboot2 so that users
only need to introduce one dependency in
+1 Great job!
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 9/13/2018 11:08，Lance Ju wrote：
+1
Great job!
DeanLee <82529...@qq.com> 于2018年9月13日周四 上午10:57写道：
+1
---Original---
From: "Willem Jiang"
Date: Wed, Sep 12, 2018 21:52 PM
To: "dev";
Subject: [DRAFT] Graduation resolution proposal
OK, I will send a PR later.
Yours sincerely
Yao Haishi
yhs0...@163.com
On 9/9/2018 16:38，Willem Jiang wrote：
Hi Haishi,
Please feel free to send a PR to keep the FAQ updated.
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 2:25 PM yhs0092 wrote:
Hi, maybe some
Hi, maybe some questions in our website
https://docs.servicecomb.io/java-chassis/en_US/question-and-answer/question_answer.html
should be updated.
For example, there is a question
Q: 框架中引入了vertx会有什么好处？
A:
启用vertx的标准工作模式更强大，不过对业务人员要求就有些高了，目前还没开放业务接口出来。vertx标准的reactive工作模式，要求业务代码中不能有任何的block
Agree to Yang Bo, too.
ServiceComb is not a common business project, it's a framework. So there are
not so many Java bean classes defined in it, which means we will not take so
much advantage of Lombok.
While using Lombok requires plug-in installed in IDE, the threshold of
developing and
I tried to upgrade Java-Chassis to support SpringBoot2 before, but failed.
There are two problems. The first one is in our bean.xml file， the xsd file is
imported like below:
```
classpath:org/springframework/beans/factory/xml/spring-beans-3.0.xsd
```
but 3.0 version xsd file does not exist
91 matches
Mail list logo
