point to use org.apache.servicecomb ?
That would be better.
Regards
JB
On 12/15/2017 12:04 PM, Willem Jiang wrote:
I just cleaned up the License header of the java-chassis and saga
projects.
Now Asif is working on clean up the License header of service-center.
@JB current we want to keep using
JB
>
>
> On 12/15/2017 12:04 PM, Willem Jiang wrote:
>
>> I just cleaned up the License header of the java-chassis and saga
>> projects.
>> Now Asif is working on clean up the License header of service-center.
>>
>> @JB current we want to keep using "io.
Any blocking point to use org.apache.servicecomb ?
That would be better.
Regards
JB
On 12/15/2017 12:04 PM, Willem Jiang wrote:
I just cleaned up the License header of the java-chassis and saga projects.
Now Asif is working on clean up the License header of service-center.
@JB current we
I just cleaned up the License header of the java-chassis and saga projects.
Now Asif is working on clean up the License header of service-center.
@JB current we want to keep using "io.servicecomb" as the package name
prefix.
Please let me know if there is any thing we need to change.
Hi,
Good one. I will take a look on the other legal (NOTICE, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE
files + package names etc).
Regards
JB
On 12/12/2017 01:23 PM, Willem Jiang wrote:
Hi,
As we are moving to Apache repo, we need to updated the code header with
ASL headers. I just had quick check with IntelliJ
Hi,
As we are moving to Apache repo, we need to updated the code header with
ASL headers. I just had quick check with IntelliJ, its quite simple for me
to the update thing.
I'm planing to do this update recently, so please make sure your PR is
merged ASAP.
Willem Jiang
Blog: http://willemjiang
