Hi Jakub
That’s possible I forgot to wrap an artifact and include a package.
Can you please create a Jira I will fix for next monthly release ?
By the way, I’m working on new way to create/install bundles on the fly.
I will share some details soon.
Regards
JB
> Le 6 févr. 2022 à 18
rove this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] -1 Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
This vote will be open for 48 hours.
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
ttps://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheservicemix-1232/
Please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] -1 Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
This vote will be open for 48 hours.
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
more. It's
"pollute" the repository. For example, we have more than 20 versions of
java-aws-sdk bundle, but we mostly release only the three last ones.
Same for Spring.
So, basically, I propose to keep only the three last versions of each
bundle.
Agree ?
Thanks,
Regards
JB
lease.
Regards
JB
Hi all,
FYI, I'm preparing the ServiceMix Bundles 2015.05 release. I should be
able to submit to vote end of this week.
Regards
JB
+1
I'm busy with a customer today and tomorrow, but I should have time on
Thursday to tackle some Jira.
Regards
JB
On 2014-03-11 15:38, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
L.S.,
Looking at the list of open issues at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM/fixforversion/12324078, we
seem to have
+1 (binding)
I checked the signatures and run the distro without problem.
Regards
JB
On 2013-07-18 21:49, Jon Anstey wrote:
Tried out the full distro and a few examples and all looked well.
+1
Cheers,
Jon
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Gert Vanthienen
wrote:
L.S.,
We've uploa
+1
Regards
JB
-Original Message-
From: Gert Vanthienen
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:20:52
To:
Reply-To: dev@servicemix.apache.org
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Alter svn layout for plugins
L.S.,
The only part of ServiceMix that's not yet available using git (via
http://git.apache.org/) ar
+1,
I will ping you on IRC to work together on the different jira.
Thanks !!!
Regards
JB
-Original Message-
From: Gert Vanthienen
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 16:13:08
To:
Reply-To: dev@servicemix.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Closing down for 4.4.0 (and 3.4.0)
L.S.,
Over at the Camel
Yes it is what I understood. I made a mistake writing the mail as I was
thinking of the examples ;)
Thanks
Regards
JB
-Original Message-
From: Gert Vanthienen
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:59:43
To: ;
Reply-To: dev@servicemix.apache.org
Subject: Re: ServiceMix 4.3.0 release preparation
Thanks a lot Kurt for your feedback.
Regards
JB
-Original Message-
From: "Kurt Westerfeld"
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 07:17:36
To:
Reply-To: dev@servicemix.apache.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix 4.3.0
I tested the ODE installation and it went well.
In previou
) into
> Sonar ?
>
> Thanks
> Regards
> JB
>
Hi all,
As we work actively on the SMX4 release with new components version (2009.01),
I will begin to update SMX3 trunk to the same components version.
I will commit a first updated pom.xml soon (this evening or tomorrow morning)
and begin tests.
Regards
JB
).
For Camel 1.6.0, I have already made the build and test (I have sent an e-mail
on the user mailing concerning this). I can make deeper tests and update.
Keep you posted.
Regards
JB
On Thursday 19 March 2009 - 12:08, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I'd like to have ServiceMix 4.0.0 rel
Hi,
the SVN repository for WSN component is :
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/components/engines/servicemix-wsn2005/trunk
Regards
JB
On Wednesday 18 March 2009 - 15:20, ObjectOrange wrote:
>
> Ok, newbie here...trying to connect to the svn repo at:
> http://svn.apache.org/
Hi Guys,
I have added a section in the wiki components list to define the roadmap on the
SMX components :
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SM/Components+list
Feel free to delete/add/change this roadmap.
Regards
JB
Hi Corrado,
I need to discuss with Lars before communicating in this way. As
servicemix-file and servicemix-ftp BCs are older than the servicemix-vfs one, I
think that not all features are present.
Regards
JB
On Monday 02 March 2009 - 14:36, Corrado Campisano wrote:
> Looks great, tha
Hi,
it looks like the SOAP marshaler fails when reading the DOM document.
Could we have your xbean.xml and an example of soap envelope request ?
Regards
JB
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 - 09:09, KrisK wrote:
>
> HI,
>
> I am getting the following error whenever i try to invoke
+1 for easymock
On Tuesday 24 February 2009 - 15:46, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I've just found that in the kernel, we use two mocks library.
> * easymock is used by gshell/features
> * jmock is used by jaas/config
> I'd like to remove one of those libraries. The question is which one
> do you
+1 to link the JBI install/uninstall with the bundle one.
Regards
JB
On Monday 23 February 2009 - 14:53, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Just want to raise the following issue on the dev list.
> Currently, in ServiceMix 4 NMR, all the JBI lifecycle happens while
> the bundle is started.
>
+1
including transaction support into the "standard" NMR feature is better.
JB
On Friday 20 February 2009 - 16:15, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> As we now deliver a workable JBI container as the distribution of the
> NMR project, I think we should consider adding transactions supp
Ok, thanks for the clarification Guillaume.
Regards
JB
On Friday 20 February 2009 - 13:22, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> In the kernel, we just handle everything through OSGi, which is much
> more powerful than just self-first / parent-first style delegation.
>
> 2009/2/20 jb :
> &g
Yes, if there are already ant tasks (that can be extended with new features),
it's fine for me.
I will take a look.
Regards
JB
On Friday 20 February 2009 - 12:06, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I don't think it's not interesting.
> I think the easiest path would be to provid
>how it can be
implemented, but from an usage point of view, it can be interesting.
Regards
JB
On Thursday 19 February 2009 - 08:31, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Yesterday, I've been trying to deploy Ode in ServiceMix 4 and found
> some problems.
>
> The first one was the fact
Guys,
If you think that the shell tool is not interesting, don't hesitate to slap me
:)
Maybe, I have forgotten that another set of tools already exist to do the same.
Regards
JB
On Friday 20 February 2009 - 10:00, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> What about the ant tasks ? You can list
Ant is fine too (embedding the ant jar libs).
I have think about connect to SMX using JMX (1099 by default).
Regards
JB
On Friday 20 February 2009 - 10:00, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> What about the ant tasks ? You can list all JBI artifacts, change
> their lifecycle etc...
> How w
he console feature and use the same "classes" in the "script"
tool.
Regards
JB
On Friday 20 February 2009 - 09:19, Lars Heinemann wrote:
> Hi JB,
>
> what would be the benefit of this? Most of the listed things can be
> achieved by using the JConsole.
>
>
to be able to
add for example a JMS SU that target a SE), test a SA (providing a typed
normalized message content)
What do you think of that ?
Could I create smx3-shell project in the tooling svn directory ?
Thanks,
Regards
JB
OK,
I have upgraded the started guide.
I repost a patch in the SMXCOMP-176 to use Java5 source (in place of "old"
styled).
Regards
JB
On Sunday 15 February 2009 - 21:37, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Yes, we've upgraded to JDK 1.5 some time ago. We really need to
> update
>From my point of view, I think that a minimal JBI container is a good way.
We can have :
- SMX kernel
- SMX JBI container including the kernel
- SMX4 including the JBI container, activemq, components, etc
Regards
JB
On Thursday 12 February 2009 - 10:19, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Current
at ServiceMix provide a large scope
>of component (provided by SMX).
What do you think ?
Regards
JB
On Wednesday 11 February 2009 - 17:06, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Have you had a look at http://jbi4corba.sourceforge.net/ ?
>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 16:45, wrote:
> > Hi all,
&g
at kind of component ?
Is it possible to use CXF directly on the NMR to exposed marshaled clob
directly using WSDL/SOAP ?
Regards
JB
Agree Guillaume.
Thanks for your feedback.
JB
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 - 14:45, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I would rather put it in the SE category because it can not really be
> accessed from an external client and does not handle a known protocol.
>
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 14
nent is a service
engine.
I would like to have your feedback about this : do you consider this component
as a BC or a SE ?
My apologize is the question looks stupid :)
Regards
JB
tigate and test how Camel and SMX components can be shared
Regards
JB
PS : for now, I have put the source code on my svn repository. I will commit on
the ASF one as soons as possible.
On Monday 02 February 2009 - 19:25, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> This should not be too complicated to implem
n be great and we will be able to
store a SOAP envlope in a flat file (for example) and send directly to
a WSDL compliant service engine (such as CXF-SE).
What do you think about this ?
Regards
JB
37 matches
Mail list logo
