2006/9/24, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 9/24/06, David Geary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2006/9/24, David Geary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > 2006/9/24, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > On 9/24/06, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey Wendy, this looks li
>From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On 9/24/06, Gary VanMatre wrote:
>
> > Hey Wendy, this looks like the classic JSF 1.1 problem with JSP that will
> > be fixed in JSF 1.2.
>
> That's what I thought. :)
>
> > It's also a good practice to wrap an included fragments in a subview tag
On 9/24/06, David Geary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2006/9/24, David Geary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> 2006/9/24, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > On 9/24/06, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey Wendy, this looks like the classic JSF 1.1 problem with JSP that
> > will
> > >
2006/9/24, David Geary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2006/9/24, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 9/24/06, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hey Wendy, this looks like the classic JSF 1.1 problem with JSP that
> will
> > be fixed in JSF 1.2.
>
> That's what I thought. :)
No, that's
2006/9/24, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 9/24/06, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Wendy, this looks like the classic JSF 1.1 problem with JSP that
will
> be fixed in JSF 1.2.
That's what I thought. :)
> It's also a good practice to wrap an included fragments in a subview
On 9/24/06, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey Wendy, this looks like the classic JSF 1.1 problem with JSP that will
be fixed in JSF 1.2.
That's what I thought. :)
It's also a good practice to wrap an included fragments in a subview tag. The
subview is a naming container that wil
>From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On 9/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Author: wsmoak
> > Date: Sun Sep 24 16:43:11 2006
> > New Revision: 449524
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=449524
> > Log:
> > Add the FindBugs plugin for reporting.
> > See http://
>From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Can someone take a look at SB-47 [1]? It's a Tiles 2 issue
> complaining about content appearing out of order, and the example app
> uses Shale.
>
Hey Wendy, this looks like the classic JSF 1.1 problem with JSP that will be
fixed in JSF 1.2.
In
Can someone take a look at SB-47 [1]? It's a Tiles 2 issue
complaining about content appearing out of order, and the example app
uses Shale.
[1] http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SB-47
Thanks,
--
Wendy
On 9/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: wsmoak
Date: Sun Sep 24 16:43:11 2006
New Revision: 449524
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=449524
Log:
Add the FindBugs plugin for reporting.
See http://mojo.codehaus.org/findbugs-maven-plugin/howto.html for configur
thx, for detailed infos
2006/9/24, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 9/24/06, stephan opitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> as i read
> http://www.diotalevi.com/weblog/?p=129
> during my study of dependency injection with ejb
>
> i had the idea to support dependency injection with help of
On 9/24/06, stephan opitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
as i read
http://www.diotalevi.com/weblog/?p=129
during my study of dependency injection with ejb
i had the idea to support dependency injection with help of the tiger
annotations.
as in article written, dependency injection does not work "f
as i read
http://www.diotalevi.com/weblog/?p=129
during my study of dependency injection with ejb
i had the idea to support dependency injection with help of the tiger
annotations.
as in article written, dependency injection does not work "from house"
in the model objects of jsf/shale.
there wa
Craig,
I'm a little confused. What is the difference between returning null
and delegating to the wrapped navigation handler, which in the case of
the default implementation, will also return null? I guess in most
cases I can think of the dialog as the only thing that should be
handling navigat
14 matches
Mail list logo
