Re: [dialog] Progress on weekend experiments

2006-08-31 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 8/31/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: @Craig, Two questions regarding your initial check in ... 1.) Why doesn't the navigation handler call render response after setting the view? Is that something that is frowned upon? I noticed the myfaces implementation does this (perhaps

Re: [dialog] Progress on weekend experiments

2006-08-31 Thread Sean Schofield
@Craig, Two questions regarding your initial check in ... 1.) Why doesn't the navigation handler call render response after setting the view? Is that something that is frowned upon? I noticed the myfaces implementation does this (perhaps incorrectly.) 2.) Why does LegacyContext need a referen

Re: [dialog] Progress on weekend experiments

2006-08-31 Thread Sean Schofield
On 8/28/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've checked in some progress on my experiments with how we can improve the Dialog functionality. Even though they're not done yet, they are far enough along to want some feedback and to make them available for experimentation and further d

Re: [dialog] Progress on weekend experiments

2006-08-30 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 8/30/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'll be able to pick this up tonight and play with it. Can someone remind me of the syntax to change the eol properties on the existing files? find . -name *.java -exec svn propset svn:eol-style native {} \; (Repeat for *.xml, etc

Re: [dialog] Progress on weekend experiments

2006-08-30 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 8/30/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'll be able to pick this up tonight and play with it. Can someone remind me of the syntax to change the eol properties on the existing files? svn propset, see: http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.0/re23.html -Rahul Craig

Re: [dialog] Progress on weekend experiments

2006-08-30 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 8/30/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8/29/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/28/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > A corresponding module for Commons SCXML has been started, but I got > > sidetracked a bit on the legacy one. It'll be pre

Re: [dialog] Progress on weekend experiments

2006-08-30 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 8/29/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8/28/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A corresponding module for Commons SCXML has been started, but I got > sidetracked a bit on the legacy one. It'll be pretty easy to finish this > off in a similar fashion, though .

Re: [dialog] Progress on weekend experiments

2006-08-28 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 8/28/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've checked in some progress on my experiments with how we can improve the Dialog functionality. Even though they're not done yet, they are far enough along to want some feedback and to make them available for experimentation and further d

[dialog] Progress on weekend experiments

2006-08-28 Thread Craig McClanahan
I've checked in some progress on my experiments with how we can improve the Dialog functionality. Even though they're not done yet, they are far enough along to want some feedback and to make them available for experimentation and further development. This mail will serve as a record of my think