On 12/4/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/4/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > * Have the base classes implement Serializable where applicable
>
>
>
> Sorry ... I should have discussed this on the li
On 12/4/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Have the base classes implement Serializable where applicable
Sorry ... I should have discussed this on the list before making these
changes. It comes out of having been badl
On 12/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Have the base classes implement Serializable where applicable
Sorry ... I should have discussed this on the list before making these
changes. It comes out of having been badly bit in cases where a subclass of
the base class *cannot*