So, ShardingSphere will abandon all existing plugins for all old versions?
What do you mean about only one plugin?
Sheng Wu 吴晟
Twitter, wusheng1108
Zhang Yonglun 于2019年12月2日周一 下午3:49写道：
> Yes, there's only one shardingsphere 4.0.0 plugin finally.
>
>
> Zhang Yonglun
> Apache ShardingSphere
>
Yes, there's only one shardingsphere 4.0.0 plugin finally.
Zhang Yonglun
Apache ShardingSphere
Sheng Wu 于2019年12月2日周一 下午2:59写道：
> So, shardingsphere will give up the plugin for RC3, am I right?
>
> Sheng Wu 吴晟
> Twitter, wusheng1108
>
>
> Zhang Yonglun 于2019年12月2日周一 上午9:52写道：
>
> > Hi
So, shardingsphere will give up the plugin for RC3, am I right?
Sheng Wu 吴晟
Twitter, wusheng1108
Zhang Yonglun 于2019年12月2日周一 上午9:52写道：
> Hi Sheng,
>
> As I know ShardingSphere-4.0.0 will be released soon. Once the release
> launch, all the RC releases plugin get useless.
> So I prefer to deal
Hi Sheng,
As I know ShardingSphere-4.0.0 will be released soon. Once the release
launch, all the RC releases plugin get useless.
So I prefer to deal with these issues you mentioned in the new release.
Zhang Yonglun
Apache ShardingSphere
Sheng Wu 于2019年12月1日周日 下午3:46写道：
> Hi ShardingSphere
Got it.
I would give an update on the issue of LICENSE when ShardingSphere for
SkyWalking backend storage moves ahead. Except for that, let’s wait for
Yonglun’s reply.
Juan Pan
panj...@apache.org
Juan Pan(Trista), Apache ShardingSphere
On 12/1/2019 21:06，Sheng Wu wrote：
Juan Pan
Juan Pan 于2019年12月1日 周日下午5:46写道：
> Hi Sheng,
>
>
> Considering some instrumental API of ShardingSphere were changed in
> 4.0.0-RC3, ISSUE[1] is needed to put on the agenda, which depends on
> Yonglun’s planning.
> Besides, it would be efficient if Yonglun could take charge of ISSUE[2]
> and
Hi Sheng,
Considering some instrumental API of ShardingSphere were changed in 4.0.0-RC3,
ISSUE[1] is needed to put on the agenda, which depends on Yonglun’s planning.
Besides, it would be efficient if Yonglun could take charge of ISSUE[2] and
ISSUE[3] since the ShardingSphere plugin for
