Re: [VOTE] Shindig 3.0 targeting Java 6

-1 Please don't! 1.5 support required~! 2010/12/16 Paul Lindner > Let's do this the apache way > > vote open 72h > > [ ] +1 I support Shindig 3.0 targeting Java 1.6 > [ ] +0 I don't care either way > [ ] -1 Stop, please don't! I need java 1.5 support. > -- -

Re: [VOTE] Shindig 3.0 targeting Java 6

Certainly is "possible", but what we find is that naturally many enterprises are slow to upgrade in general. This is a little frustrating for us on the JDK front and even more so on the browser front (yes we still support ie6). I think that in order to increase enterprise adoption of OpenSocial

Re: [VOTE] Shindig 3.0 targeting Java 6

-1 still many on 1.5 2010/12/19, ๏̯͡๏ Jasvir Nagra : > +1 > > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Pablo Graña wrote: > >> -1. >> >> Unfortunately, some of our clients are still on java 5. >> >> thanks >> >> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Eric Woods wrote: >> > +1 non-binding. >> > >> > Thanks,

Re: [VOTE] Shindig 3.0 targeting Java 6

+1 On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Pablo Graña wrote: > -1. > > Unfortunately, some of our clients are still on java 5. > > thanks > > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Eric Woods wrote: > > +1 non-binding. > > > > Thanks, > > Eric W. > > >

Hudson build is back to normal : Shindig #2067

See

Re: [VOTE] Shindig 3.0 targeting Java 6

-1. Unfortunately, some of our clients are still on java 5. thanks On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Eric Woods wrote: > +1 non-binding. > > Thanks, > Eric W. >

Re: [VOTE] Shindig 3.0 targeting Java 6

+1 non-binding. Thanks, Eric W.

Re: [VOTE] Shindig 3.0 targeting Java 6

I believe you are offering Shindig as separate portlet in Liferay portal. Would it be acceptable that for customers that want to support OpenSocial (via Shindig) should be willing to upgrade to Java6? - Henry On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Michael Young wrote: > Not an easy question to answer,