Hi,
Thanks for the above. But still i'm not clear about this. According to the
above I should be able to get Shindig work with OAuth using oauth.json
without implementing new class. As I understood these changes are
only necessary if I'm going to use Shindig to a product where oauth data are
Yes. That's correct. You can only change oauth.json file to test oauth
in shindig.
However, if you restart the shindig server, all oauth keys will be lost
since they
are not saved in DB, which means users will have to again approve oauth
for all
oauth gadgets.
On 30.06.11 08:25, Sumedha
Hi Evgeny,
Ok. Now I'm clear about this. So I should be able to test a oauth gadget.
But I'm unable to test oauth as you said although I had changed the
oauth.json. When I test a oauth gadget above error comes out. Also I'm not
getting to approve oauth.
Is my oauth.json is not read by shindig,
The identifier of your oauth service probably doesn't match, for Google it's
google. See the following example:
http://www.example.com/oauthtest.xml; : {
google : {
consumer_key : www.example.com,
consumer_secret : mysecret,
key_type : HMAC-SHA1
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/974/
---
(Updated 2011-06-30 13:09:14.957078)
Review request for shindig, johnfargo and
It's correct. Here is the entry in my oauth.json
http://dirk.balfanz.googlepages.com/contacts.xml; : {
google : {
consumer_key : weitu.googlepages.com,
consumer_secret :
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/983/
---
Review request for shindig.
Summary
---
Change to return first descendant
I'm not sure about that. I used it because it was given in the above
mentioned thread.
My url is
http://localhost:8080/gadgets/ifr?url=http://dirk.balfanz.googlepages.com/contacts.xml
And I didn't use a security token. I just did the things in the above
thread.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 7:48 PM,
Hi Derek,
These suggestions are very valuable. One way you can immediately help
to improve our docs and help system is to file JIRA
(https://issues.apache.org) issues for Apache Shindig project. This
could help us to keep track and plan what fixes or upgrades need to be
done.
The Shindig
I might be wrong, but it is probably connected to the fact that you do
not give
security token with gadget spec url.
That is what it says below. I slightly remember something like that,
guess this is why I had to add security token in my tutorial.
Something went wrong: Could not fetch gadget
Actually I think its probably related to the fact that the OAuth
implementation that comes with Shindig ends up using
TestSecurityTokenCodec.java. This is a default implementation
SecurityToken but has static URL values for the gadget in the security
token, not the actual URL for the gadget.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/983/#review938
---
Ship it!
LGTM
- Ryan
On 2011-06-30 14:51:09, Dan Dumont wrote:
Hi Derek,
I think a lot of people would agree with your points below. I myself, and
may others I work with, have found it a little frustrating getting off the
ground with Shindig for many of the reasons you outline below. However we
need to start somewhere, if you are willing to document
I am pretty sure your correct Henry. I know Mark was thinking about
redoing app data and preferences in the OpenSocial 2.0 spec, but I don't
think there was much progress on that.
-Ryan
Email: rjbax...@us.ibm.com
Phone: 978-899-3041
developerWorks Profile
From: Henry Saputra
Mike should be able to give more information on this since he wrote the
common container.
-Ryan
Email: rjbax...@us.ibm.com
Phone: 978-899-3041
developerWorks Profile
From: Jasha Joachimsthal j.joachimst...@onehippo.com
To: dev@shindig.apache.org,
Date: 06/29/2011 07:34 AM
Subject:
From the OpenSocial Social Data Spec (version 1.1)[1]: OpenSocial defines
a data store that applications can use to read and write user-specific data.
This data store can be read by anyone who can see the gadget, but only the
VIEWER's data is writable.
This sentence is there in the 2.0 draft
16 matches
Mail list logo
