Dan,
In the Shindig code, who is responsible to set
"osapi.container.RenderParam.MODULE_ID" in the render params for
services's getGadgetMetadata() function?
- Henry
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Dan Dumont wrote:
> Not a problem.
>
> mid is for the moduleId. (maybe it wasn't always so...
Hi Paul,
Will this change impact released 3.0.0 snapshot artifacts in the maven
repo
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/shindig?
- Henry
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Paul Lindner wrote:
> okay, I'll submit a change to 2.5.0-SNAPSHOT and change the Jira
okay, I'll submit a change to 2.5.0-SNAPSHOT and change the Jira issues to
reflect the new numbering.
Rave folks you'll want to update your deps...
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Ryan J Baxter wrote:
> +1
>
>
> Regards,
>
> *RYAN J. BAXTER*
> Software Engineer - OpenSocial
> IBM Collaboratio
Ate, these seem like valid concerns, but I am not a lawyer so not sure I
understand all the implications :) What does the rest of the community
think? What is the best way to address these? I assume we want to start
by creating JIRAs
-Ryan
From: Ate Douma
To: dev@shindig.apach
+1
Regards,
RYAN J. BAXTER
Software Engineer - OpenSocial
IBM Collaboration Solutions
Phone: 1-978-899-3041
E-mail: rjbax...@us.ibm.com
Blog: ryanjbaxter.com
Chat: rbaxter85 ryanjasonbaxter
Find me on: and within IBM on:
550 King St
Littleton, MA 01460-1250
United States
From:
+1
On 01/26/2012 08:42 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
Dear Apache Shindig community,
As Apache Shindig is reference implementation for the OpenSocial
specs, it would be better if the release version is aligned with the
OS spec number to make it easier to find out what is the implemented
spec version.
+1
>-Original Message-
>From: Dan Dumont [mailto:ddum...@us.ibm.com]
>Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 2:51 PM
>To: dev@shindig.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Aligning the next Shindig release number with OpenSocial spec
>version to use 2.5.0 instead of 3.0.0
>
>+1
>
>Or the other way around.
+1
Or the other way around. Move the spec to 3.0 :)
From: Evgeny Bogdanov
To: dev@shindig.apache.org,
Date: 01/26/2012 02:49 PM
Subject:Re: Aligning the next Shindig release number with
OpenSocial spec version to use 2.5.0 instead of 3.0.0
+1, it'd be easier
On 26/1/
+1, it'd be easier
On 26/1/12 20:42, Henry Saputra wrote:
Dear Apache Shindig community,
As Apache Shindig is reference implementation for the OpenSocial
specs, it would be better if the release version is aligned with the
OS spec number to make it easier to find out what is the implemented
sp
Dear Apache Shindig community,
As Apache Shindig is reference implementation for the OpenSocial
specs, it would be better if the release version is aligned with the
OS spec number to make it easier to find out what is the implemented
spec version.
One proposal is to change the current Shindig rel
Disregard. Since I sent this, the 1/26 snapshots became available and
everything is working fine.
Thanks
Mike
On 1/26/12 11:21 AM, "Michael Matthews" wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> It appears there was a problem with the latest deploy of the 3.0.0 snapshot
> artifacts to the maven repo
> https://re
Hello all.
It appears there was a problem with the latest deploy of the 3.0.0 snapshot
artifacts to the maven repo
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/shin
dig. Some of the artifacts (shindig-common) have an artifact for 1/25 and
others do not (latest shindig-g
12 matches
Mail list logo