Releases?

Hello all, After reading up on the website and mailing list, I got a bit confused about the releases that you've made. On the one hand, the latest release you mention on your website is 2.0.0 [1], on the other hand on the list I've seen votes (that have passed) for at least a couple of newer re

Re: [VOTE] Vote the fate of PHP part of Apache Shindig after 2.5.0 release

+1 (non-binding). Move PHP version to attic and remove references from website. Sent from my iPad On 19 apr. 2012, at 01:02, Henry Saputra wrote: > Hi Shindig community, > > As followup of the fate of PHP version of Apache Shindig from my > previous email to the community, I would like to ask

Re: [VOTE] Vote the fate of PHP part of Apache Shindig after 2.5.0 release

Henry, I'm cross posting this to the opensocial list as well. I know there are some folks that work on (or maybe used to work on!) PHP, namely, Bastian. On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > Hi Shindig community, > > As followup of the fate of PHP version of Apache Shindig from

Re: Review Request: SHINDIG-1677 Fix the REST response for collection to wrap it with "list" field

> On 2012-04-19 00:31:10, Ryan Baxter wrote: > > trunk/java/common/src/test/java/org/apache/shindig/protocol/RestfulCollectionTest.java, > > line 37 > > > > > > small nit, change the variable name from entry to list Th

Re: Review Request: SHINDIG-1677 Fix the REST response for collection to wrap it with "list" field

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/4760/#review7012 --- Ship it! LGTM just one small nit trunk/java/common/src/test/java/or

[VOTE] Vote the fate of PHP part of Apache Shindig after 2.5.0 release

Hi Shindig community, As followup of the fate of PHP version of Apache Shindig from my previous email to the community, I would like to ask for a VOTE thread of what should be done with it after 2.5.0 release. Maintaining status quo seems to be out question now since we have lack of contributors

Re: Upgrading slf4j from 1.5.11 to 1.6.1

Cool, thanks Stanton - Henry On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Stanton Sievers wrote: > Good call.  I had forgotten to do that.  Committed revision 1327589. > > > > From:   Henry Saputra > To:     dev@shindig.apache.org, > Date:   04/18/2012 13:15 > Subject:        Re: Upgrading slf4j from 1.5.

Re: Upgrading slf4j from 1.5.11 to 1.6.1

Good call. I had forgotten to do that. Committed revision 1327589. From: Henry Saputra To: dev@shindig.apache.org, Date: 04/18/2012 13:15 Subject:Re: Upgrading slf4j from 1.5.11 to 1.6.1 Please also do update the UPGRADING doc for the dependency change. - Henry On Wed, A

Re: Upgrading slf4j from 1.5.11 to 1.6.1

Please also do update the UPGRADING doc for the dependency change. - Henry On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Stanton Sievers wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to upgrade the slf4j dependency from 1.5.11 to 1.6.1 (or newer) > to support some EhCache work that I'm currently working on in Shindig.

Re: Upgrading slf4j from 1.5.11 to 1.6.1

Done. Committed revision 1327574. From: Paul Lindner To: dev@shindig.apache.org, Date: 04/18/2012 12:36 Subject:Re: Upgrading slf4j from 1.5.11 to 1.6.1 Go ahead. We were using that old version because ehcache was using it at the time. On Apr 18, 2012 9:31 AM, "Stanton Sie

Re: Upgrading slf4j from 1.5.11 to 1.6.1

Sounds good to me. -Ryan From: Stanton Sievers/Westford/IBM@Lotus To: dev@shindig.apache.org, Date: 04/18/2012 12:30 PM Subject:Upgrading slf4j from 1.5.11 to 1.6.1 Hi everyone, I'd like to upgrade the slf4j dependency from 1.5.11 to 1.6.1 (or newer) to support some EhCac

Re: Review Request: When the property gadgets.jsonProxyUrl.maxPostSize is missing from the container.js the default post size ends up being 0 instead of using the default value

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/4789/#review7007 --- Committed revision 1327569 - Ryan On 2012-04-18 14:54:36, Ryan Baxt

Re: Upgrading slf4j from 1.5.11 to 1.6.1

Go ahead. We were using that old version because ehcache was using it at the time. On Apr 18, 2012 9:31 AM, "Stanton Sievers" wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to upgrade the slf4j dependency from 1.5.11 to 1.6.1 (or newer) > to support some EhCache work that I'm currently working on in Shindig

Upgrading slf4j from 1.5.11 to 1.6.1

Hi everyone, I'd like to upgrade the slf4j dependency from 1.5.11 to 1.6.1 (or newer) to support some EhCache work that I'm currently working on in Shindig. Does anyone have any objections to this? Any particular version other than 1.6.1 people would rather see? JIRA: https://issues.apache.or

Re: Review Request: When the property gadgets.jsonProxyUrl.maxPostSize is missing from the container.js the default post size ends up being 0 instead of using the default value

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/4789/#review7006 --- Ship it! +1 - Stanton On 2012-04-18 14:54:36, Ryan Baxter wrote: >

Re: Review Request: When the property gadgets.jsonProxyUrl.maxPostSize is missing from the container.js the default post size ends up being 0 instead of using the default value

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/4789/#review7005 --- Ship it! LGTM, thanks for fixing this. - Dan On 2012-04-18 14:54:3

Review Request: When the property gadgets.jsonProxyUrl.maxPostSize is missing from the container.js the default post size ends up being 0 instead of using the default value

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/4789/ --- Review request for shindig and Dan Dumont. Summary --- If a container.js is

Review Request: Change "message.put(name, sw.toString().trim())" to "message.put(name.sw.toString())" for JIRA 1540

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/4786/ --- Review request for shindig. Summary --- line 172 in MessageBundle.java: "me