Gave it the basic spin. Binaries look good. RAT seems fine.
+1
On Tuesday, March 12, 2013, wrote:
> As long as the code was checked in as of about 7:30 PM EST than they
> should be in. By the way I added the 2.5.0 version back to the fix list of
> the JIRAs as well so they show up in the 2.5.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9891/
---
Review request for shindig.
Description
---
Replace FutureUtil and Immediat
As long as the code was checked in as of about 7:30 PM EST than they should be
in. By the way I added the 2.5.0 version back to the fix list of the JIRAs as
well so they show up in the 2.5.0 release notes as well.
On Mar 12, 2013, at 8:39 PM, Stanton Sievers wrote:
> Quick update. I had thre
Quick update. I had three issues that weren't marked with 2.5.0-beta6 as
the fix version. Ryan, unless you tell me otherwise, I'll assume they went
into beta6.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20SHINDIG%20AND%20issuetype%20%3D%20Improvement%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222
Hi,
We solved 20 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20SHINDIG%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.5.0-beta6%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=proje
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9859/#review17758
---
Ship it!
Committed revision 1455719
- Stanton Sievers
On March 12
+1 if you can get them in today I will try and kick off a beta 6 build tonight.
On Mar 12, 2013, at 7:43 AM, Stanton Sievers wrote:
> +1
> On Mar 12, 2013 7:42 AM, "Matt Franklin" wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, March 12, 2013, Paul Lindner wrote:
>>
>>> Now that we're on Java 1.6 we can use more rec
+1
On Mar 12, 2013 7:42 AM, "Matt Franklin" wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 12, 2013, Paul Lindner wrote:
>
> > Now that we're on Java 1.6 we can use more recent Guava and closure
> > compiler releases.
> >
> > +1
>
>
> > If no one objects I can commit the following. I also have some other
> > cleanu
On Tuesday, March 12, 2013, Paul Lindner wrote:
> Now that we're on Java 1.6 we can use more recent Guava and closure
> compiler releases.
>
> +1
> If no one objects I can commit the following. I also have some other
> cleanups ready to go after this.
>
> iff --git a/java/gadgets/pom.xml b/java
Good to know, but that doesn't solve the problem for Camel, does it?
What difference does it make to have APL => APL => GPL or directly APL =>
GPL coupling?
It just shifts the problem from Shindig or Camel to SpringData.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Chris Geer [mailto:ch...@cxtsoftware.
Now that we're on Java 1.6 we can use more recent Guava and closure
compiler releases.
If no one objects I can commit the following. I also have some other
cleanups ready to go after this.
iff --git a/java/gadgets/pom.xml b/java/gadgets/pom.xml
index fab0813..3036c93 100644
--- a/java/gadgets/po
11 matches
Mail list logo