The build breakage was the spark. There have been more than a few
java 6 related issues encountered since most devs use Java6 and don't
test on java5.
Another big concern is the problem we have with dependencies that are
or will move to Java 6. A perfect example is closure compiler which is
Java
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 2:56 AM, Paul Lindner wrote:
> Looks like the tally is:
>
> 10 +1
> 3 -1
>
> So.. No native 1.6 at the current time.
>
> I investigated a number of techniques for providing backwards
> compatibility. Most of them are geared towards 1.4 level
> compatibility and are n
Looks like the tally is:
10 +1
3 -1
So.. No native 1.6 at the current time.
I investigated a number of techniques for providing backwards
compatibility. Most of them are geared towards 1.4 level
compatibility and are not apropos. One small step we could take
involves
* Use -source 1.6 a
-1 Please don't! 1.5 support required~!
2010/12/16 Paul Lindner
> Let's do this the apache way
>
> vote open 72h
>
> [ ] +1 I support Shindig 3.0 targeting Java 1.6
> [ ] +0 I don't care either way
> [ ] -1 Stop, please don't! I need java 1.5 support.
>
--
-
rg
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shindig 3.0 targeting Java 6
I believe you are offering Shindig as separate portlet in Liferay portal.
Would it be acceptable that for customers that want to support
OpenSocial (via Shindig) should be willing to upgrade to Java6?
- Henry
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Mic
-1 still many on 1.5
2010/12/19, ๏̯͡๏ Jasvir Nagra :
> +1
>
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Pablo Graña wrote:
>
>> -1.
>>
>> Unfortunately, some of our clients are still on java 5.
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Eric Woods wrote:
>> > +1 non-binding.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
+1
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Pablo Graña wrote:
> -1.
>
> Unfortunately, some of our clients are still on java 5.
>
> thanks
>
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Eric Woods wrote:
> > +1 non-binding.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Eric W.
> >
>
-1.
Unfortunately, some of our clients are still on java 5.
thanks
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Eric Woods wrote:
> +1 non-binding.
>
> Thanks,
> Eric W.
>
+1 non-binding.
Thanks,
Eric W.
I believe you are offering Shindig as separate portlet in Liferay portal.
Would it be acceptable that for customers that want to support
OpenSocial (via Shindig) should be willing to upgrade to Java6?
- Henry
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Michael Young
wrote:
> Not an easy question to answer,
Not an easy question to answer, but basically we have a lot of enterprise
customers who run older app servers like Websphere 6 and they will not be able
to move to Java 6 for some time. We will eventually move but not in at least
the next 2 years or so.
- Mike
--
Follow us on Twitter: liferay
We work off a release branch for the most part. But we generally update as soon
as a release it cut.
- Mike
--
Follow us on Twitter: liferay
On Dec 15, 2010, at 3:51 PM, John Hjelmstad wrote:
> Do you import Shindig @head, or are you working off a release branch?
>
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3
+1
--- On Wed, 12/15/10, Michael Young wrote:
> From: Michael Young
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shindig 3.0 targeting Java 6
> To: dev@shindig.apache.org
> Date: Wednesday, December 15, 2010, 3:46 PM
> -1.
>
> We need will need Java 5 compatibility for some time
&g
Any idea when you might end-of-life java 1.5 support?
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Michael Young
wrote:
> -1.
>
> We need will need Java 5 compatibility for some time forward.
>
> - Mike
> --
> Follow us on Twitter: liferay
>
> On Dec 15, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Paul Lindner wrote:
>
>> Let's do t
Do you import Shindig @head, or are you working off a release branch?
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Michael Young wrote:
> -1.
>
> We need will need Java 5 compatibility for some time forward.
>
> - Mike
> --
> Follow us on Twitter: liferay
>
> On Dec 15, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Paul Lindner wrote:
-1.
We need will need Java 5 compatibility for some time forward.
- Mike
--
Follow us on Twitter: liferay
On Dec 15, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Paul Lindner wrote:
> Let's do this the apache way
>
> vote open 72h
>
> [ ] +1 I support Shindig 3.0 targeting Java 1.6
> [ ] +0 I don't care either w
+1
2010/12/15 Alvaro Garcia
> +1
>
> 2010/12/15 Paul Lindner
>
> > Let's do this the apache way
> >
> > vote open 72h
> >
> > [ ] +1 I support Shindig 3.0 targeting Java 1.6
> > [ ] +0 I don't care either way
> > [ ] -1 Stop, please don't! I need java 1.5 support.
> >
>
+1
2010/12/15 Paul Lindner
> Let's do this the apache way
>
> vote open 72h
>
> [ ] +1 I support Shindig 3.0 targeting Java 1.6
> [ ] +0 I don't care either way
> [ ] -1 Stop, please don't! I need java 1.5 support.
>
+1
-Original Message-
From: Paul Lindner [mailto:lind...@inuus.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 2:51 PM
To: dev@shindig.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Shindig 3.0 targeting Java 6
Let's do this the apache way
vote open 72h
[ ] +1 I support Shindig 3.0 targeting Java 1.6 [
FYI
Proposed code implementing suggestion:
http://codereview.appspot.com/3666043/
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Maxwell wrote:
> +1
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 15/12/2010, at 17:52, John Hjelmstad wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Paul Lindner
> wrote:
> >
> >>
+1
Sent from my iPhone
On 15/12/2010, at 17:52, John Hjelmstad wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Paul Lindner wrote:
>
>> Let's do this the apache way
>>
>> vote open 72h
>>
>> [ ] +1 I support Shindig 3.0 targeting Java 1.6
>> [ ] +0 I don't care either way
>> [ ] -1
+1 non-binding
>> Let's do this the apache way
>>
>> vote open 72h
>>
>> [ ] +1 I support Shindig 3.0 targeting Java 1.6
>> [ ] +0 I don't care either way
>> [ ] -1 Stop, please don't! I need java 1.5 support.
>>
--
Mat Mannion
Senior Web Developer
IT Services
University of Warwick
Coven
+1
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Paul Lindner wrote:
> Let's do this the apache way
>
> vote open 72h
>
> [ ] +1 I support Shindig 3.0 targeting Java 1.6
> [ ] +0 I don't care either way
> [ ] -1 Stop, please don't! I need java 1.5 support.
>
--
Thanks,
Henry
+1
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Paul Lindner wrote:
> Let's do this the apache way
>
> vote open 72h
>
> [ ] +1 I support Shindig 3.0 targeting Java 1.6
> [ ] +0 I don't care either way
> [ ] -1 Stop, please don't! I need java 1.5 support.
>
Let's do this the apache way
vote open 72h
[ ] +1 I support Shindig 3.0 targeting Java 1.6
[ ] +0 I don't care either way
[ ] -1 Stop, please don't! I need java 1.5 support.
25 matches
Mail list logo
