Hello,
What is the license of the below method adapted from
http://today.java.net/pub/a/today/2007/04/03/perils-of-image-getscaledinstance.html
? is it a LGPL license?
org.apache.shindig.gadgets.rewrite.image.ImageUtils.getSacledInstance(
BufferedImage img,
int targetWidth,
good question..
It appears that the original source code in the zip file is not downloadable
anymore.
I did a search on codesearch.google.com and found the same code included in
a many projects, all without attribution.
Cc:ing the original author -- Chris can you help us out here? Thanks!
On
org.jdesktop.swingx.graphics.GraphicsUtilities#createThumbnail is very
similar and is LGPL/BSD.
GraphicsUtilities is referenced in the article and can still be found
here:
https://swingx.dev.java.net/files/documents/2981/149644/swingx-2010_04_18-src.zip
Thanks,
Chirag
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7
I no longer have that source bundle in hand, but I'm quite sure it was BSD
licensed (like all my other demos).
Chris
On May 27, 2010, at 7:27 AM, Paul Lindner wrote:
> good question..
>
> It appears that the original source code in the zip file is not downloadable
> anymore.
>
> I did a sear
targetHeight,
Object hint,
boolean higherQuality,
int imageType) {
..
}
From: Chirag Shah
To: dev@shindig.apache.org
Cc: chrispcampb...@gmail.com
Date: 05/27/2010 11:33 AM
Subject:Re: Is ImageUtils.getSacledInstance() LGPL license
Date: 05/27/2010 11:33 AM
Subject: Re: Is ImageUtils.getSacledInstance() LGPL license?
org.jdesktop.swingx.graphics.GraphicsUtilities#createThumbnail is very
similar and is LGPL/BSD.
GraphicsUtilities is referenced in the article and can still be found
here:
https://swingx.dev.java.net/
dInstance(BufferedImage img,
> int targetWidth,
> int targetHeight,
> Object hint,
> boolean higherQuality,
> int imageType) {
> ..
> }
>
>
>
> From: Chirag Shah
> To: dev@shi
Thank you very much!
From: Paul Lindner
To: dev@shindig.apache.org
Cc: chrispcampb...@gmail.com
Date: 05/29/2010 05:20 AM
Subject:Re: Is ImageUtils.getSacledInstance() LGPL license?
Sent by:lind...@inuus.com
I don't think we need to change anything.
* I s
