RE: SecurityTokenKeyFile

2011-11-22 Thread Ciancetta, Jesse E.
Done! >-Original Message- >From: Stanton Sievers [mailto:ssiev...@us.ibm.com] >Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 3:58 PM >To: dev@shindig.apache.org >Subject: Re: SecurityTokenKeyFile > >Sounds good to me. +1 > > > >From: Ryan J Baxter/Westford/IBM@Lotu

Re: SecurityTokenKeyFile

2011-11-22 Thread Stanton Sievers
Sounds good to me. +1 From: Ryan J Baxter/Westford/IBM@Lotus To: dev@shindig.apache.org, Date: 11/22/2011 15:23 Subject:Re: SecurityTokenKeyFile +1 -Ryan Email: rjbax...@us.ibm.com Phone: 978-899-3041 developerWorks Profile From: Henry Saputra To: dev

Re: SecurityTokenKeyFile

2011-11-22 Thread Ryan J Baxter
+1 -Ryan Email: rjbax...@us.ibm.com Phone: 978-899-3041 developerWorks Profile From: Henry Saputra To: dev@shindig.apache.org, Date: 11/22/2011 03:17 PM Subject:Re: SecurityTokenKeyFile I could live with updating the UPGRADING file. +1 - Henry On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12

Re: SecurityTokenKeyFile

2011-11-22 Thread Henry Saputra
would > be alright to go ahead and cleanup the config and remove the old property. > > Would an entry in the UPGRADING file for this property name change suffice?   > I'd really rather keep the configuration clean if we can... > >>Thanks, >>-Stanton >> >> >&

RE: SecurityTokenKeyFile

2011-11-22 Thread Ciancetta, Jesse E.
>-Original Message- >From: Stanton Sievers [mailto:ssiev...@us.ibm.com] >Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 2:56 PM >To: dev@shindig.apache.org >Subject: Re: SecurityTokenKeyFile > >I thought the code was backwards compatible. Jesse, did your recent >change remove

Re: SecurityTokenKeyFile

2011-11-22 Thread Stanton Sievers
Subject:Re: SecurityTokenKeyFile Thanks Jesse, Hmm maybe we should add code for old config compatibility for 3.0? Need to also check for "securityTokenKeyFile" config. Stanton, Ryan? - Henry On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:42 AM, daviesd wrote: > Ah, I didn't catc

Re: SecurityTokenKeyFile

2011-11-22 Thread Henry Saputra
tyTokenKey > works.  Thanks a lot! > > doug > > > On 11/22/11 2:36 PM, "Ciancetta, Jesse E." wrote: > >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Ciancetta, Jesse E. >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 2:24 PM >>> To: shindig >>

Re: SecurityTokenKeyFile

2011-11-22 Thread daviesd
Ah, I didn't catch that. Sorry. Yes, changing to just securityTokenKey works. Thanks a lot! doug On 11/22/11 2:36 PM, "Ciancetta, Jesse E." wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Ciancetta, Jesse E. >> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 2:24

RE: SecurityTokenKeyFile

2011-11-22 Thread Ciancetta, Jesse E.
>-Original Message- >From: Ciancetta, Jesse E. >Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 2:24 PM >To: shindig >Subject: RE: SecurityTokenKeyFile > >>-Original Message- >>From: daviesd [mailto:davi...@oclc.org] >>Sent: Tuesday, November 22,

RE: SecurityTokenKeyFile

2011-11-22 Thread Ciancetta, Jesse E.
>-Original Message- >From: daviesd [mailto:davi...@oclc.org] >Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 2:14 PM >To: shindig >Subject: SecurityTokenKeyFile > >I know there was a change recently (SHINDIG-1636) that changed the way the >token encryption key was loaded. I use to have > >"gadgets.secur