> On 2011-11-02 00:28:45, Ryan Baxter wrote:
> > One small nit, otherwise LGTM
Committed revision 1196683.
- Ryan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/2648/#review3003
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/2648/#review3012
---
Ship it!
LGTM!
- Dan
On 2011-11-01 18:12:28, Stanton Sievers wrote
> On 2011-11-01 19:00:41, Jesse Ciancetta wrote:
> > This looks good to me, however if we're going to go this route I wouldn't
> > mind seeing the BlobCrypterSecurityTokenCodec changed to always expect to
> > get the actual token key from ContainerConfig -- and then making the code
> > that pa
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/2648/#review3003
---
Ship it!
One small nit, otherwise LGTM
http://svn.apache.org/repos/
> On 2011-11-01 19:00:41, Jesse Ciancetta wrote:
> > This looks good to me, however if we're going to go this route I wouldn't
> > mind seeing the BlobCrypterSecurityTokenCodec changed to always expect to
> > get the actual token key from ContainerConfig -- and then making the code
> > that pa
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/2648/#review2993
---
Ship it!
This looks good to me, however if we're going to go this rou
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/2648/
---
(Updated 2011-11-01 18:12:28.326279)
Review request for shindig, Ryan Baxter and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/2648/
---
(Updated 2011-11-01 17:16:16.418233)
Review request for shindig, Ryan Baxter and
