Re: Shindig gadget-and-container framework

2010-06-15 Thread John Hjelmstad
Sorry for the very-delayed response. Still figured this is worth commenting. On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Paul Lindner wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Kam Kasravi >wrote: > > > Will this framework be taking advantage of the features framework where > > views would be appropriatel

Re: Shindig gadget-and-container framework

2010-05-12 Thread ๏̯͡๏ Jasvir Nagra
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Paul Lindner wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Kam Kasravi >wrote: > > > Will this framework be taking advantage of the features framework where > > views would be appropriately expanded, etc? > > > > Not sure.. John? > > > > Also, has there been any ef

Re: Shindig gadget-and-container framework

2010-05-12 Thread Paul Lindner
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Kam Kasravi wrote: > Will this framework be taking advantage of the features framework where > views would be appropriately expanded, etc? > Not sure.. John? > Also, has there been any effort to expand gadgets.rpc so that gadget <-> > gadget or gadget broadcas

Re: Shindig gadget-and-container framework

2010-05-12 Thread Kam Kasravi
Will this framework be taking advantage of the features framework where views would be appropriately expanded, etc? Also, has there been any effort to expand gadgets.rpc so that gadget <-> gadget or gadget broadcast would allow gadgets to communicate with one another? Finally is the new js tak

Re: Shindig gadget-and-container framework

2010-05-12 Thread Michael Hermanto
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Paul Lindner wrote: > Thanks for getting this process going Michael. This will really make > Shindig much easier to use. > > Regarding some questions raised below here's my opinions: > > * Metadata 'render' api should allow an array of [gadget url, moduleId, > vi

Re: Shindig gadget-and-container framework

2010-05-12 Thread Paul Lindner
Thanks for getting this process going Michael. This will really make Shindig much easier to use. Regarding some questions raised below here's my opinions: * Metadata 'render' api should allow an array of [gadget url, moduleId, view] * Metadata api should be flexible enough to form the basis of a

Shindig gadget-and-container framework

2010-05-12 Thread Michael Hermanto
Hi all, In Google, we've been developing a lightweight gadget-and-container framework, called "common container", to 1) simplify container and gadget integration model, and 2) provide near-zero barrier to entry to become a gadget container. The framework is a combination of JS (which container cli