:Re: json vs json-simple
We'll go for 1.1 Beta5 for now. And use org.json.
Thanks a lot for your answer.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Paul Lindner
wrote:
> Oh and 2.0.0 won't need json-simple, since it's not a direct dependency.
> There's also been some talk
We'll go for 1.1 Beta5 for now. And use org.json.
Thanks a lot for your answer.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Paul Lindner wrote:
> Oh and 2.0.0 won't need json-simple, since it's not a direct dependency.
> There's also been some talk of replacing the json.org code with something
> similar.
Oh and 2.0.0 won't need json-simple, since it's not a direct dependency.
There's also been some talk of replacing the json.org code with something
similar. Perhaps the people working on that can give a status update on
that...
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Paul Lindner wrote:
> I spun off
I spun off 2.0-rc1 a while back, however it's not stable. I'm catching up
and will work to get an RC2 release this week and then a final 2.0.0 release
in the next two weeks.
2010/7/10 Pablo Graña
> Hi All.
>
> We are starting working on integrating shindig in our own platform. We have
> a coupl
Hi All.
We are starting working on integrating shindig in our own platform. We have
a couple of doubts:
- Which version is more stable? there is a 2.0-rc1 tag, and a 1.1-beta5. The
beta5 is published in repo1, so that is the one we are using. We have no
preferences over which spec to use (0.9 or
