[slf4j-dev] svn commit: r481 - in slf4j/trunk: src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl tests/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging

2006-01-09 Thread ceki
Author: ceki Date: Mon Jan 9 17:02:32 2006 New Revision: 481 Modified: slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/SLF4JLog.java slf4j/trunk/tests/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/InvokeJCLTest.java Log: Fix in case message is null. See bug #12 for more details http://bugzilla

[slf4j-dev] [Bug 12] NullPointerException in SLF4JLog.java (jcl104-over-slf4j.jar)

2006-01-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[slf4j-dev] [Bug 12] NullPointerException in SLF4JLog.java (jcl104-over-slf4j.jar)

2006-01-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-09 17:21 --- Hello Boris, Thank you for your valuable input to this report. Based on http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38174, it seems that you advocate an approach

[slf4j-dev] svn commit: r482 - slf4j/trunk/tests/src/java/org/slf4j/impl

2006-01-09 Thread ceki
Author: ceki Date: Mon Jan 9 17:30:57 2006 New Revision: 482 Modified: slf4j/trunk/tests/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/MessageFormatterTest.java Log: Testing null input parameters. Modified: slf4j/trunk/tests/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/MessageFormatterTest.java ===

[slf4j-dev] [Bug 11] Exceptionhandler Design of MessageFormatter

2006-01-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[slf4j-dev] svn commit: r483 - slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/impl

2006-01-09 Thread ceki
Author: ceki Date: Mon Jan 9 17:52:59 2006 New Revision: 483 Modified: slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/SimpleLogger.java Log: Remove superflous message.toString() call which made SimpleLogger vulnerable to null input. Modified: slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/SimpleLogger.java

[slf4j-dev] svn commit: r484 - slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/impl

2006-01-09 Thread ceki
Author: ceki Date: Mon Jan 9 17:56:25 2006 New Revision: 484 Modified: slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/JDK14LoggerAdapter.java Log: Remove superflous message.toString() calls which made JDK14LoggerAdapter vulnerable to null input. Modified: slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/JDK14Logg

[slf4j-dev] [Bug 11] Exceptionhandler Design of MessageFormatter

2006-01-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-09 18:02 --- Recent test cases showed that SimpleLogger and JDK14LoggerAdapter contained vulnerability points to null input. These vulnerability points have removed in 1.0- RC5. --

[slf4j-dev] svn commit: r485 - slf4j/trunk/tests/src/java/org/slf4j

2006-01-09 Thread ceki
Author: ceki Date: Mon Jan 9 18:13:42 2006 New Revision: 485 Modified: slf4j/trunk/tests/src/java/org/slf4j/InvokingSLF4J.java Log: more tests for null input Modified: slf4j/trunk/tests/src/java/org/slf4j/InvokingSLF4J.java =

[slf4j-dev] svn commit: r486 - slf4j/trunk

2006-01-09 Thread ceki
Author: ceki Date: Mon Jan 9 18:14:02 2006 New Revision: 486 Modified: slf4j/trunk/build.properties Log: preparing RC5 Modified: slf4j/trunk/build.properties == --- slf4j/trunk/build.properties(original) +++ s

[nlog4j-dev] svn commit: r487 - nlog4j/trunk/src/java/org/apache/log4j

2006-01-09 Thread ceki
Author: ceki Date: Mon Jan 9 18:14:35 2006 New Revision: 487 Modified: nlog4j/trunk/src/java/org/apache/log4j/Category.java Log: improved resiliance to null input Modified: nlog4j/trunk/src/java/org/apache/log4j/Category.java ===

[nlog4j-dev] svn commit: r488 - nlog4j/trunk

2006-01-09 Thread ceki
Author: ceki Date: Mon Jan 9 18:17:32 2006 New Revision: 488 Modified: nlog4j/trunk/build.properties Log: preparing 1.2.21 Modified: nlog4j/trunk/build.properties == --- nlog4j/trunk/build.properties (original)

[nlog4j-dev] svn commit: r489 - nlog4j/trunk/src/xdocs

2006-01-09 Thread ceki
Author: ceki Date: Mon Jan 9 18:18:09 2006 New Revision: 489 Modified: nlog4j/trunk/src/xdocs/changes.xml nlog4j/trunk/src/xdocs/download.xml Log: preparing 1.2.21 Modified: nlog4j/trunk/src/xdocs/changes.xml == --

[nlog4j-dev] svn commit: r490 - nlog4j/trunk/src/xdocs/lf5

2006-01-09 Thread ceki
Author: ceki Date: Mon Jan 9 18:19:08 2006 New Revision: 490 Removed: nlog4j/trunk/src/xdocs/lf5/ Log: removed lf5 dir ___ nlog4j-dev mailing list nlog4j-dev@slf4j.org http://slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/nlog4j-dev

[slf4j-dev] svn commit: r491 - slf4j/trunk/tests/lib

2006-01-09 Thread ceki
Author: ceki Date: Mon Jan 9 18:19:53 2006 New Revision: 491 Added: slf4j/trunk/tests/lib/nlog4j-1.2.21.jar (contents, props changed) Log: updated nlog4j version Added: slf4j/trunk/tests/lib/nlog4j-1.2.21.jar == Bin

[slf4j-dev] svn commit: r495 - slf4j/tags/SLF4J_1.0RC5

2006-01-09 Thread ceki
Author: ceki Date: Mon Jan 9 18:41:06 2006 New Revision: 495 Added: slf4j/tags/SLF4J_1.0RC5/ - copied from r494, slf4j/trunk/ Log: ___ dev mailing list dev@slf4j.org http://slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

[slf4j-dev] svn commit: r498 - slf4j/trunk/tests/lib

2006-01-09 Thread ceki
Author: ceki Date: Mon Jan 9 18:44:39 2006 New Revision: 498 Removed: slf4j/trunk/tests/lib/nlog4j-1.2.20.jar Log: typo fix ___ dev mailing list dev@slf4j.org http://slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Re: [slf4j-dev] x4juli and slf4j

2006-01-09 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 10:17 PM 1/5/2006, Boris Unckel wrote: I hope to release x4juli 0.7 soon. Can you estimate a timeframe when the next slf4j version will arrive? Can you give me a hint whether you accept the patch in Bugzilla #10 or not? Although a benign refactorization, I tend to decline the patch for th

[slf4j-dev] [Bug 10] Enhancement for support of native implementations in JDK14Logger

2006-01-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: [slf4j-dev] [Bug 10] Enhancement for support of native implementations in JDK14Logger

2006-01-09 Thread Boris Unckel
Hello, I quoted from two messages regarding the same point, sorry, but they belong together: > Given that you already have this code in X4JuliLoggerFactory class, there > is no benefit in replicating it in JDK14LoggerFactory. >From http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.slf4j.devel/437 > Altho