Author: ceki
Date: Thu Jan 26 09:57:52 2006
New Revision: 519
Added:
slf4j/tags/SLF4J_20060126/
- copied from r518, slf4j/trunk/
Log:
A snapshot taken previous to Logger and MakerLogger merge.
___
dev mailing list
dev@slf4j.org
http://slf4j.o
Hello,
While working on LOGBack, an experimental successor to log4j, it
became apparent that Marker objects bring very significant new
functionality. Given that no existing logging system actually
supported markers may cast doubts on this assertion. In versions of
SLF4J prior to 1.0-beta8, the L
Author: ceki
Date: Thu Jan 26 14:11:13 2006
New Revision: 520
Added:
slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/WrappingLoggerAdapter.java
Modified:
slf4j/trunk/build.xml
slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/Logger.java
slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/JCLLoggerAdapter.java
slf4j/trunk/src/ja
Author: ceki
Date: Thu Jan 26 14:11:53 2006
New Revision: 521
Removed:
slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/MNOPLogger.java
slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/MNOPLoggerFactory.java
slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/MSimpleLogger.java
slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/MSimpleLogger
Author: ceki
Date: Thu Jan 26 14:12:22 2006
New Revision: 522
Removed:
slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/MarkingLogger.java
Log:
deleted superflous interface
___
dev mailing list
dev@slf4j.org
http://slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Author: ceki
Date: Thu Jan 26 14:12:54 2006
New Revision: 523
Removed:
slf4j/trunk/tests/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/MLogger.java
Modified:
slf4j/trunk/tests/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/XLogger.java
Log:
reflecting the merge of Logger and MarkingLogger interfaces
Modified: slf4j/trunk/tests/src/ja
Author: ceki
Date: Thu Jan 26 14:15:55 2006
New Revision: 524
Added:
slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/MarkerIgnoringAdapterBase.java
- copied, changed from r520,
slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/WrappingLoggerAdapter.java
Removed:
slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/WrappingLogg
Author: ceki
Date: Thu Jan 26 14:52:57 2006
New Revision: 525
Added:
slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/MarkerIgnoringBase.java
- copied, changed from r524,
slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/MarkerIgnoringAdapterBase.java
Removed:
slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/MarkerIgnoringA
Author: ceki
Date: Thu Jan 26 14:53:59 2006
New Revision: 526
Modified:
slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/MarkerIgnoringBase.java
Log:
javadoc improvements
Modified: slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/MarkerIgnoringBase.java
=
Author: ceki
Date: Thu Jan 26 14:54:32 2006
New Revision: 527
Modified:
slf4j/trunk/build.xml
Log:
reflecting class name changes
Modified: slf4j/trunk/build.xml
==
--- slf4j/trunk/build.xml (original)
+++ slf4j/
Author: ceki
Date: Thu Jan 26 15:04:15 2006
New Revision: 528
Modified:
slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/MarkerIgnoringBase.java
Log:
Make the class visible outside its package
Modified: slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/MarkerIgnoringBase.java
===
Hello Ceki,
> I intend to merge methods in MarkingLogger back into Logger with the
> understanding that the bindings for logging systems without marker
> support would simply ignore the Marker data (as was the vase prior to
> SLF4J 1.0beta8).
>
> Comments?
>
I am anxious to see LogBack - does th
My last mail did not correspond to the actual changes in svn. Some of my
questions/points found answers through that.
> I intend to merge methods in MarkingLogger back into Logger with the
> understanding that the bindings for logging systems without marker
> support would simply ignore the Marker
At 04:03 PM 1/26/2006, Boris Unckel wrote:
Hello Ceki,
> I intend to merge methods in MarkingLogger back into Logger with the
> understanding that the bindings for logging systems without marker
> support would simply ignore the Marker data (as was the vase prior to
> SLF4J 1.0beta8).
>
> Commen
I appreciate your comments.
I think one needs to approach these questions with
pragmatism. Maintaining absolute (as in total) backward compatibility
in presence of evolution is an incredibly costly proposal. It is
beyond reach for everyone except perhaps the largest software
companies. Even in t
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments Fr
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-27 00:20 ---
My patch does not introduce any extra CPU overhead, since when the logger
source class is provided in a
LogRecord, the JDK implementation does attempt to determine it on
17 matches
Mail list logo