Re: [slf4j-dev] Adding TRACE level

2007-06-18 Thread Endre Stølsvik
Ceki Gulcu wrote Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:38:17 -0700: > Hello All, > > Is there any opposition to adding the TRACE level in the next version > of SLF4J, namely 1.4.0? Oh NO, please don't! That would be absolute hell! One more verbosity-level? What should one DO with all these levels?! The users'

Re: [slf4j-dev] FATAL level

2007-06-18 Thread Ceki Gulcu
Hello Lilianne, Sorry for not replying earlier. I don't believe there is strong demand for this level. Moreover, each level requires ten new methods to be added to the Logger interface which in turn need to be implemented in each binding which I am not too keen on doing. If you were using logbac

Re: [slf4j-dev] Adding TRACE level

2007-06-18 Thread Ceki Gulcu
Endre, Thanks for your message. Well, the trace level has been requested by some users politely and sometimes less politely. I was convinced by Costin's use-case [1] quoted below: At the moment we are left with one major issue and that is having a jcl11-over-sfl4j bridge. AFAIK, the only