[slf4j-dev] 1.3 release?

Hello all, After John is done updating version related information, I think we should consider cutting a release. One question lingering on my mind is the question of the various OSGi modules, namely osgi-over-slf4j, slf4j-osgi-integration-test and slf4j-osgi-test-bundle. Should these modules in

Re: [slf4j-dev] 1.3 release?

Hi, Ceki Gülcü wrote: > Any other issues that need to be dealt with? I know this is the second time I post this: I am still not happy with the underlying JCL Release. 1.0.4 is old and 1.1 is out since 10 May 2006. SLF4J is in the excelent situation of active maintenance and contributors. It ha

Re: [slf4j-dev] 1.3 release?

At 06:03 PM 2/24/2007, Boris Unckel wrote: >Hi, > >Ceki Gülcü wrote: > > Any other issues that need to be dealt with? >I know this is the second time I post this: >I am still not happy with the underlying JCL Release. 1.0.4 is old and >1.1 is out since 10 May 2006. You mean the JCL 1.0.4 dependen

Re: [slf4j-dev] 1.3 release?

Ceki Gülcü wrote: > At 06:03 PM 2/24/2007, Boris Unckel wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Ceki Gülcü wrote: >> >>> Any other issues that need to be dealt with? >>> >> I know this is the second time I post this: >> I am still not happy with the underlying JCL Release. 1.0.4 is old and >> 1.1 is o

Re: [slf4j-dev] 1.3 release?

Hi Boris, Thank your for the clarification. The 1.3 release fixes 2 relatively critical problems. As such, I would like to get 1.3 out the door ASAP. I would appreciate if you could file a bug report so that the JCL 1.1 can be dealt with promptly, as in SLF4J 1.3.1. Does that sound OK? At 06

Re: [slf4j-dev] 1.3 release?

Hi Ceki, Ceki Gülcü wrote: > Hi Boris, > > Thank your for the clarification. The 1.3 release fixes 2 relatively > critical problems. As such, I would like to get 1.3 out the door ASAP. I > would appreciate if you could file a bug report so that the JCL 1.1 can be > dealt with promptly, as in SL

Re: [slf4j-dev] 1.3 release?

Ceki Gülcü wrote: > Hello all, > > After John is done updating version related information, I think we > should consider cutting a release. > > One question lingering on my mind is the question of the various OSGi > modules, namely osgi-over-slf4j, slf4j-osgi-integration-test and > slf4j-osgi-test-

Re: [slf4j-dev] 1.3 release?

John E. Conlon wrote: > Ceki Gülcü wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> After John is done updating version related information, I think we >> should consider cutting a release. >> >> One question lingering on my mind is the question of the various OSGi >> modules, namely osgi-over-slf4j, slf4j-osgi-int