Ceki Gulcu wrote Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:38:17 -0700:
Hello All,
Is there any opposition to adding the TRACE level in the next version
of SLF4J, namely 1.4.0?
Oh NO, please don't! That would be absolute hell! One more
verbosity-level? What should one DO with all these levels?! The users'
Endre,
Thanks for your message.
Well, the trace level has been requested by some users politely and
sometimes less politely.
I was convinced by Costin's use-case [1] quoted below:
At the moment we are left with one major issue and that is having a
jcl11-over-sfl4j bridge. AFAIK, the
Yes, it's really me. The fact that it took me merely 4 years may indicate
otherwise, but only donkeys don't change their minds. :-)
Boris Unckel wrote:
Hi,
is it really Ceki using this eMail account? :-)
Ceki Gulcu wrote:
Hello All,
Is there any opposition to adding the TRACE level
Hi,
is it really Ceki using this eMail account? :-)
Ceki Gulcu wrote:
Hello All,
Is there any opposition to adding the TRACE level in the next version of
SLF4J,
namely 1.4.0?
I am not using it (no usecase) but go ahead, many people demand it.
Regards
Boris
